Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9600
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 and Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo P8800
- CPU is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.559 vs 0.514
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 April 2009 vs 15 July 2008 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 35 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.559 vs 0.514 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T9600
- Around 5% higher clock speed: 2.8 GHz vs 2.66 GHz
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1111 vs 1075
- Around 15% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1078 vs 937
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 369 vs 352
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 658 vs 600
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.299 vs 0.285
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 22.781 vs 16.672
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.092 vs 0.077
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.117 vs 1.976
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz vs 2.66 GHz |
L2 cache | 6134 KB vs 3 MB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1111 vs 1075 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1078 vs 937 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 369 vs 352 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 658 vs 600 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.299 vs 0.285 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 22.781 vs 16.672 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.092 vs 0.077 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.117 vs 1.976 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo P8800
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T9600
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 | Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1075 | 1111 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 937 | 1078 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 352 | 369 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 600 | 658 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.285 | 0.299 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.672 | 22.781 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.077 | 0.092 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.559 | 0.514 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.976 | 2.117 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 | Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Penryn | Penryn |
Launch date | 1 April 2009 | 15 July 2008 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $241 | $316 |
Place in performance rating | 3167 | 3132 |
Price now | $56.99 | $89.95 |
Processor Number | P8800 | T9600 |
Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Value for money (0-100) | 9.00 | 6.31 |
Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2.66 GHz | 2.80 GHz |
Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | 1066 MHz FSB |
Die size | 107 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | 1066 MHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB | |
L2 cache | 3 MB | 6134 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 105°C | 105°C |
Maximum frequency | 2.66 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
Transistor count | 410 million | 410 million |
VID voltage range | 1.00V-1.25V | 1.05V-1.2125V |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | 35mm x 35mm |
Sockets supported | PGA478, BGA479 | BGA479, PGA478 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 35 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) |