Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9300
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 and Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo P8800
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher clock speed: 2.66 GHz vs 2.5 GHz
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1075 vs 1025
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.285 vs 0.27
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.976 vs 1.963
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 April 2009 vs 10 January 2008 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.66 GHz vs 2.5 GHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1075 vs 1025 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.285 vs 0.27 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.976 vs 1.963 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T9300
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 983 vs 937
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 20.086 vs 16.672
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.079 vs 0.077
| Specifications (specs) | |
| L2 cache | 6144 KB vs 3 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 983 vs 937 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 601 vs 600 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 20.086 vs 16.672 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.079 vs 0.077 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo P8800
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T9300
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 | Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1075 | 1025 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 937 | 983 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 352 | 352 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 600 | 601 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.285 | 0.27 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.672 | 20.086 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.077 | 0.079 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.559 | 0.559 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.976 | 1.963 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 | Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Penryn | Penryn |
| Launch date | 1 April 2009 | 10 January 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $241 | $316 |
| Place in performance rating | 3155 | 3159 |
| Price now | $56.99 | $57.99 |
| Processor Number | P8800 | T9300 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 9.00 | 8.48 |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.66 GHz | 2.50 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | 800 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 6144 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C | 105°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.66 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 410 million | 410 million |
| VID voltage range | 1.00V-1.25V | 1.000V-1.250V |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | 35mm x 35mm |
| Sockets supported | PGA478, BGA479 | PGA478, BGA479 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 35 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 with others
IntelCore 2 Duo P8800 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo T9300
IntelCore 2 Duo P8800 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo T8100
IntelCore 2 Duo P8800 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo T9400
