Intel Core 2 Duo T5250 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9300
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo T5250 and Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T9300
- Around 5% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 100°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 80% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1022 vs 568
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 988 vs 556
- Around 94% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 352 vs 181
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 601 vs 269
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 100°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1022 vs 568 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 988 vs 556 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 352 vs 181 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 601 vs 269 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo T5250
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T9300
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core 2 Duo T5250 | Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 568 | 1022 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 556 | 988 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 181 | 352 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 269 | 601 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.27 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 20.086 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.079 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.559 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.963 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core 2 Duo T5250 | Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Merom | Penryn |
| Place in performance rating | 3173 | 3171 |
| Processor Number | T5250 | T9300 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Launch date | 10 January 2008 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $316 | |
| Price now | $57.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 8.48 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.50 GHz | 2.50 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 667 MHz FSB | 800 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 105°C |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 291 million | 410 million |
| VID voltage range | 1.075V-1.250V | 1.000V-1.250V |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 800 MHz | |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | |
| L2 cache | 6144 KB | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.5 GHz | |
| Number of threads | 2 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | 35mm x 35mm |
| Sockets supported | PPGA478 | PGA478, BGA479 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||