Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9400
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 and Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T9800
- CPU is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher clock speed: 2.92 GHz vs 2.53 GHz
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1203 vs 1029
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1193 vs 1000
- Around 6% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 362 vs 342
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 696 vs 618
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.31 vs 0.272
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 24.171 vs 21.389
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.097 vs 0.079
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.621 vs 0.509
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.253 vs 1.993
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 January 2009 vs 15 July 2008 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.92 GHz vs 2.53 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1203 vs 1029 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1193 vs 1000 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 362 vs 342 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 696 vs 618 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.31 vs 0.272 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 24.171 vs 21.389 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.097 vs 0.079 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.621 vs 0.509 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.253 vs 1.993 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo T9800
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T9400
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 | Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1203 | 1029 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1193 | 1000 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 362 | 342 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 696 | 618 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.31 | 0.272 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 24.171 | 21.389 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.097 | 0.079 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.621 | 0.509 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.253 | 1.993 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 | Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Penryn | Penryn |
| Launch date | 1 January 2009 | 15 July 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $530 | $316 |
| Place in performance rating | 3086 | 3168 |
| Price now | $423.89 | $69.95 |
| Processor Number | T9800 | T9400 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.40 | 7.31 |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.93 GHz | 2.53 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | 1066 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | 1066 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 6134 KB | 6134 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C | 105°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.92 GHz | 2.53 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 410 million | 410 million |
| VID voltage range | 1.050V-1.162V | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | 35mm x 35mm |
| Sockets supported | PGA478, BGA479 | PGA478, BGA479 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||