Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T9800
- Around 46% higher clock speed: 2.92 GHz vs 2 GHz
- Around 5% higher maximum core temperature: 105°C vs 100°C
- Around 29% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 45 Watt
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1203 vs 883
- Around 20% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 362 vs 301
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 24.171 vs 22.898
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.92 GHz vs 2 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C vs 100°C |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 45 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1203 vs 883 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 362 vs 301 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 24.171 vs 22.898 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1586 vs 1193
- Around 26% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 875 vs 696
- Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.387 vs 0.31
- Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.118 vs 0.097
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1586 vs 1193 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 875 vs 696 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.387 vs 0.31 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.118 vs 0.097 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo T9800
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1203 | 883 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1193 | 1586 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 362 | 301 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 696 | 875 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.31 | 0.387 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 24.171 | 22.898 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.097 | 0.118 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.621 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.253 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Penryn | Penryn |
| Launch date | 1 January 2009 | 1 January 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $530 | $348 |
| Place in performance rating | 3086 | 3087 |
| Price now | $423.89 | $389 |
| Processor Number | T9800 | Q9000 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.40 | 1.91 |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.93 GHz | 2.00 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | 1066 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | 1066 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | |
| L2 cache | 6134 KB | 6134 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.92 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 4 |
| Transistor count | 410 million | 410 million |
| VID voltage range | 1.050V-1.175V | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | 35mm x 35mm |
| Sockets supported | PGA478, BGA479 | PGA478 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 45 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 with others
IntelCore 2 Duo T9800 vs
IntelPentium 4-M 1.80
IntelCore 2 Duo T9800 vs
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9000
IntelCore 2 Duo T9800 vs
IntelPentium N3540
