Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9400
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 und Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 Prozessoren für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Leistung, Kompatibilität, Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit, Fortschrittliche Technologien, Virtualisierung. Benchmark-Prozessorleistungsanalyse: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Core 2 Duo T9800
- CPU ist neuer: Startdatum 5 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 15% höhere Taktfrequenz: 2.92 GHz vs 2.53 GHz
- Etwa 17% bessere Leistung in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1203 vs 1029
- Etwa 19% bessere Leistung in PassMark - CPU mark: 1193 vs 1000
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 362 vs 342
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 696 vs 618
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.31 vs 0.272
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 24.171 vs 21.389
- Etwa 23% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.097 vs 0.079
- Etwa 22% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.621 vs 0.509
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.253 vs 1.993
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 1 January 2009 vs 15 July 2008 |
Maximale Frequenz | 2.92 GHz vs 2.53 GHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1203 vs 1029 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1193 vs 1000 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 362 vs 342 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 696 vs 618 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.31 vs 0.272 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 24.171 vs 21.389 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.097 vs 0.079 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.621 vs 0.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.253 vs 1.993 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo T9800
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T9400
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 | Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1203 | 1029 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1193 | 1000 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 362 | 342 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 696 | 618 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.31 | 0.272 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 24.171 | 21.389 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.097 | 0.079 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.621 | 0.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.253 | 1.993 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 | Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur Codename | Penryn | Penryn |
Startdatum | 1 January 2009 | 15 July 2008 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $530 | $316 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 3086 | 3168 |
Jetzt kaufen | $423.89 | $69.95 |
Processor Number | T9800 | T9400 |
Serie | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 1.40 | 7.31 |
Vertikales Segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Leistung |
||
64-Bit-Unterstützung | ||
Base frequency | 2.93 GHz | 2.53 GHz |
Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | 1066 MHz FSB |
Matrizengröße | 107 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
Frontseitiger Bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | 1066 MHz |
L1 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 Cache | 6134 KB | 6134 KB |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Maximale Kerntemperatur | 105°C | 105°C |
Maximale Frequenz | 2.92 GHz | 2.53 GHz |
Anzahl der Adern | 2 | 2 |
Anzahl der Gewinde | 2 | 2 |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 410 million | 410 million |
VID-Spannungsbereich | 1.050V-1.162V | |
Kompatibilität |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | 35mm x 35mm |
Unterstützte Sockel | PGA478, BGA479 | PGA478, BGA479 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Sicherheit & Zuverlässigkeit |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution Technologie (TXT) | ||
Fortschrittliche Technologien |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® Technologie | ||
FSB-Parität | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading Technologie | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost Technologie | ||
Virtualisierung |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) |