Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 vs Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 and Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T9900
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher clock speed: 3.06 GHz vs 2.3 GHz
- 6x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1190 vs 899
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1199 vs 834
- Around 63% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 444 vs 272
- Around 60% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 760 vs 474
- Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.324 vs 0.226
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 23.559 vs 7.743
- Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.094 vs 0.058
- Around 61% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.622 vs 0.387
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2.322 vs 1.639
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 April 2009 vs 10 January 2009 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.06 GHz vs 2.3 GHz |
| L2 cache | 6134 KB vs 1024 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1190 vs 899 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1199 vs 834 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 444 vs 272 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 760 vs 474 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.324 vs 0.226 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 23.559 vs 7.743 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.094 vs 0.058 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.622 vs 0.387 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.322 vs 1.639 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Duo T9900
CPU 2: Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 | Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1190 | 899 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1199 | 834 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 444 | 272 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 760 | 474 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.324 | 0.226 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 23.559 | 7.743 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.094 | 0.058 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.622 | 0.387 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.322 | 1.639 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 | Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Penryn | Penryn |
| Launch date | 1 April 2009 | 10 January 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $530 | |
| Place in performance rating | 3070 | 3238 |
| Price now | $398.95 | |
| Processor Number | T9900 | T4500 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 1.57 | |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 3.06 GHz | 2.30 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 1066 MHz FSB | 800 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 1066 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 6134 KB | 1024 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 105°C | |
| Maximum frequency | 3.06 GHz | 2.3 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 410 million | 410 million |
| VID voltage range | 1.050V-1.2125V | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Package Size | 35mm | |
| Sockets supported | BGA479, PGA478 | PGA478 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||