Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9775 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9775 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9775
- Around 20% higher clock speed: 3.2 GHz vs 2.67 GHz
Maximum frequency | 3.2 GHz vs 2.67 GHz |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450
- Around 13% higher maximum core temperature: 71.4°C vs 63°C
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 58% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 150 Watt
Maximum core temperature | 71.4°C vs 63°C |
L1 cache | 256 KB vs 128 KB |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9775
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450
Name | Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9775 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1128 | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2186 | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 403 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1322 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.573 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 31.997 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.177 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.154 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.249 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9775 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Yorkfield | Yorkfield |
Launch date | March 2008 | March 2008 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 2973 |
Processor Number | QX9775 | Q9450 |
Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Price now | $335 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 3.31 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 3.20 GHz | 2.66 GHz |
Bus Speed | 1600 MHz FSB | 1333 MHz FSB |
Die size | 214 mm2 | 214 mm2 |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 256 KB |
L2 cache | 12288 KB | 12288 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 63 °C | 71 °C |
Maximum core temperature | 63°C | 71.4°C |
Maximum frequency | 3.2 GHz | 2.67 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
Transistor count | 820 million | 820 million |
VID voltage range | 0.850V-1.3500V | 0.8500V-1.3625V |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
Sockets supported | LGA771 | LGA775 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 95 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) |