Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
- 11x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.035 vs 0.094
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.035 vs 0.094 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
- Around 15% higher clock speed: 2.67 GHz vs 2.33 GHz
- Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1138 vs 999
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2124 vs 1777
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 376 vs 320
- Around 14% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1151 vs 1006
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.574 vs 0.501
- Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 26.509 vs 16.702
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.136 vs 0.111
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.189 vs 3.688
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.67 GHz vs 2.33 GHz |
| L2 cache | 6144 KB vs 4096 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1138 vs 999 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2124 vs 1777 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 376 vs 320 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1151 vs 1006 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.574 vs 0.501 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 26.509 vs 16.702 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.136 vs 0.111 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.189 vs 3.688 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 999 | 1138 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1777 | 2124 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 320 | 376 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1006 | 1151 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.501 | 0.574 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.702 | 26.509 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.111 | 0.136 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.035 | 0.094 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.688 | 4.189 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Yorkfield | Yorkfield |
| Launch date | August 2008 | August 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 3115 | 3116 |
| Price now | $22.99 | $33.98 |
| Processor Number | Q8200 | Q9400 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 36.05 | 28.99 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.33 GHz | 2.66 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | 1333 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 164 mm2 | 164 mm2 |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB | 6144 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | 71 °C |
| Maximum core temperature | 71.4°C | 71.4°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.33 GHz | 2.67 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
| Transistor count | 456 million | 456 million |
| VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | 0.8500V-1.3625V |
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Sockets supported | LGA775 | LGA775 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 95 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 with others
IntelCore 2 Quad Q8200 vs
AMDAthlon XP 2800+
IntelCore 2 Quad Q8200 vs
IntelPentium 4 1.80
IntelCore 2 Quad Q8200 vs
AMDSempron 3800+
IntelCore 2 Quad Q8200 vs
AMDPhenom X4 9850 (125W)
IntelCore 2 Quad Q8200 vs
IntelPentium E5200
IntelCore 2 Quad Q8200 vs
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9400
