Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
- 11x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.035 vs 0.094
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.035 vs 0.094 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
- Around 15% higher clock speed: 2.67 GHz vs 2.33 GHz
- Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1137 vs 998
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2132 vs 1783
- Around 18% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 376 vs 320
- Around 14% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1151 vs 1006
- Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.574 vs 0.501
- Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 26.509 vs 16.702
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.136 vs 0.111
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.189 vs 3.688
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum frequency | 2.67 GHz vs 2.33 GHz |
L2 cache | 6144 KB vs 4096 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1137 vs 998 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2132 vs 1783 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 376 vs 320 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1151 vs 1006 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.574 vs 0.501 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 26.509 vs 16.702 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.136 vs 0.111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.189 vs 3.688 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 998 | 1137 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1783 | 2132 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 320 | 376 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1006 | 1151 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.501 | 0.574 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.702 | 26.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.111 | 0.136 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.035 | 0.094 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.688 | 4.189 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Yorkfield | Yorkfield |
Launch date | August 2008 | August 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 3117 | 3118 |
Price now | $22.99 | $33.98 |
Processor Number | Q8200 | Q9400 |
Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Value for money (0-100) | 36.05 | 28.99 |
Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Base frequency | 2.33 GHz | 2.66 GHz |
Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | 1333 MHz FSB |
Die size | 164 mm2 | 164 mm2 |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
L2 cache | 4096 KB | 6144 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | 71 °C |
Maximum core temperature | 71.4°C | 71.4°C |
Maximum frequency | 2.33 GHz | 2.67 GHz |
Number of cores | 4 | 4 |
Transistor count | 456 million | 456 million |
VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | 0.8500V-1.3625V |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
Sockets supported | LGA775 | LGA775 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 95 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) |