Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 vs Intel Pentium E5200
Comparative analysis of Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 and Intel Pentium E5200 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 91% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1782 vs 932
- Around 8% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 320 vs 296
- Around 96% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1006 vs 514
- Around 81% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.501 vs 0.277
- Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 16.702 vs 10.446
- Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.111 vs 0.059
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| L1 cache | 256 KB vs 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB vs 2048 KB (shared) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1782 vs 932 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 320 vs 296 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1006 vs 514 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.501 vs 0.277 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.702 vs 10.446 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.111 vs 0.059 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium E5200
- Around 7% higher clock speed: 2.5 GHz vs 2.33 GHz
- Around 4% higher maximum core temperature: 74.1°C vs 71.4°C
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 998 vs 993
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.5 GHz vs 2.33 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 74.1°C vs 71.4°C |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 998 vs 993 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
CPU 2: Intel Pentium E5200
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 | Intel Pentium E5200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 993 | 998 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1782 | 932 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 320 | 296 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1006 | 514 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.501 | 0.277 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.702 | 10.446 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.111 | 0.059 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.035 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.688 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 | Intel Pentium E5200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Yorkfield | Wolfdale |
| Launch date | August 2008 | August 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 3129 | 3131 |
| Price now | $22.99 | $89.95 |
| Processor Number | Q8200 | E5200 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 36.05 | 4.87 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.33 GHz | 2.50 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | 800 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 164 mm2 | 82 mm2 |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB | 2048 KB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 71 °C | |
| Maximum core temperature | 71.4°C | 74.1°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.33 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 456 million | 228 million |
| VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | 0.8500V-1.3625V |
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Sockets supported | LGA775 | LGA775 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 65 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 with others
IntelCore 2 Quad Q8200 vs
AMDAthlon XP 2800+
IntelCore 2 Quad Q8200 vs
IntelPentium D 940
IntelCore 2 Quad Q8200 vs
AMDSempron 2800+
IntelCore 2 Quad Q8200 vs
AMDAthlon X2 BE-2400
IntelCore 2 Quad Q8200 vs
IntelPentium E5200
IntelCore 2 Quad Q8200 vs
IntelCore 2 Quad Q9400
