Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 versus Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 et Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Compatibilité, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
- 11x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 1.035 versus 0.094
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.035 versus 0.094 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
- Environ 15% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 2.67 GHz versus 2.33 GHz
- Environ 50% plus de la cache L2, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L2 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1138 versus 998
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 2132 versus 1783
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 376 versus 320
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1151 versus 1006
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.574 versus 0.501
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 26.509 versus 16.702
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.136 versus 0.111
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.189 versus 3.688
Caractéristiques | |
Fréquence maximale | 2.67 GHz versus 2.33 GHz |
Cache L2 | 6144 KB versus 4096 KB |
Référence | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1138 versus 998 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2132 versus 1783 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 376 versus 320 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1151 versus 1006 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.574 versus 0.501 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 26.509 versus 16.702 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.136 versus 0.111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.189 versus 3.688 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Nom | Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 998 | 1138 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1783 | 2132 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 320 | 376 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1006 | 1151 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.501 | 0.574 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.702 | 26.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.111 | 0.136 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.035 | 0.094 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.688 | 4.189 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel Core 2 Quad Q8200 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Nom de code de l’architecture | Yorkfield | Yorkfield |
Date de sortie | August 2008 | August 2008 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 3117 | 3118 |
Prix maintenant | $22.99 | $33.98 |
Processor Number | Q8200 | Q9400 |
Série | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 36.05 | 28.99 |
Segment vertical | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
Soutien de 64-bit | ||
Base frequency | 2.33 GHz | 2.66 GHz |
Bus Speed | 1333 MHz FSB | 1333 MHz FSB |
Taille de dé | 164 mm2 | 164 mm2 |
Cache L1 | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Cache L2 | 4096 KB | 6144 KB |
Processus de fabrication | 45 nm | 45 nm |
Température maximale de la caisse (TCase) | 71 °C | 71 °C |
Température de noyau maximale | 71.4°C | 71.4°C |
Fréquence maximale | 2.33 GHz | 2.67 GHz |
Nombre de noyaux | 4 | 4 |
Compte de transistor | 456 million | 456 million |
Rangée de tension VID | 0.8500V-1.3625V | 0.8500V-1.3625V |
Mémoire |
||
Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Compatibilité |
||
Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
Prise courants soutenu | LGA775 | LGA775 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 95 Watt |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
FSB parity | ||
Idle States | ||
Intel 64 | ||
Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) |