Intel Core i5-8400 vs Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i5-8400 and Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i5-8400
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 18% higher clock speed: 4.00 GHz vs 3.40 GHz
- Around 33% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 75°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- Around 46% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2373 vs 1657
- Around 70% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1048 vs 618
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 73.097 vs 67.377
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 3.767 vs 3.684
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 10.333 vs 9.875
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 January 2017 vs September 2013 |
| Maximum frequency | 4.00 GHz vs 3.40 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 75°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2373 vs 1657 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1048 vs 618 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 73.097 vs 67.377 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.767 vs 3.684 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 10.333 vs 9.875 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 6
- 10 more threads: 16 vs 6
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2.2x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- 6x more maximum memory size: 768 GB vs 128 GB
- Around 88% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 17381 vs 9223
- Around 7% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 4894 vs 4580
- Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 7.754 vs 5.68
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.893 vs 0.752
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 8 vs 6 |
| Number of threads | 16 vs 6 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) vs 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) vs 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 20480 KB (shared) vs 9 MB |
| Maximum memory size | 768 GB vs 128 GB |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 vs 1 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 17381 vs 9223 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 4894 vs 4580 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 7.754 vs 5.68 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.893 vs 0.752 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i5-8400
CPU 2: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i5-8400 | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2373 | 1657 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 9223 | 17381 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1048 | 618 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 4580 | 4894 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 3633 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.68 | 7.754 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 73.097 | 67.377 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.752 | 0.893 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.767 | 3.684 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 10.333 | 9.875 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1826 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3900 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6201 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1826 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3900 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6201 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core i5-8400 | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Coffee Lake | Ivy Bridge EP |
| Launch date | 5 January 2017 | September 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $190 | $650 |
| Place in performance rating | 1149 | 2035 |
| Price now | $259 | $260.56 |
| Processor Number | i5-8400 | E5-2650V2 |
| Series | 8th Generation Intel® Core™ i5 Processors | Intel® Xeon® Processor E5 v2 Family |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Value for money (0-100) | 13.28 | 14.78 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Server |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.80 GHz | 2.60 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s DMI3 | 8 GT/s QPI |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 9 MB | 20480 KB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 75°C |
| Maximum frequency | 4.00 GHz | 3.40 GHz |
| Number of cores | 6 | 8 |
| Number of threads | 6 | 16 |
| Die size | 160 mm | |
| Number of QPI Links | 2 | |
| Transistor count | 1400 million | |
| VID voltage range | 0.65–1.30V | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 59.7 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | 768 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR3 800/1066/1333/1600/1866 |
| ECC memory support | ||
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0x3E92 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.05 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 64 GB | |
| Processor graphics | Intel® UHD Graphics 630 | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
Graphics image quality |
||
| 4K resolution support | ||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 52.5mm x 51mm |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1151 | FCLGA2011 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015C (65W) | |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | 40 |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | x4, x8, x16 |
| Scalability | 1S Only | 2S Only |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® AVX |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 46-bit | |
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core i5-8400 with others
IntelCore i5-8400 vs
IntelCore i7-4770R
IntelCore i5-8400 vs
IntelCore i7-7800X
IntelCore i5-8400 vs
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 2400GE
IntelCore i5-8400 vs
IntelPentium Gold G5400T
IntelCore i5-8400 vs
AMDAthlon Gold PRO 3150GE
IntelCore i5-8400 vs
AMDRyzen Embedded R2544
