Intel Core i7-2630QM vs Intel Core 2 Extreme X7900
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i7-2630QM and Intel Core 2 Extreme X7900 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-2630QM
- CPU is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 6 more threads: 8 vs 2
- Around 4% higher clock speed: 2.90 GHz vs 2.8 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1227 vs 1085
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 3561 vs 1104
- Around 72% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.53 vs 0.308
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 57.448 vs 20.342
- Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.731 vs 0.436
- 6.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 13.909 vs 2.227
- 3.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.313 vs 0.082
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 January 2011 vs 1 September 2007 |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 8 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.90 GHz vs 2.8 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 65 nm |
| L1 cache | 256 KB vs 128 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1227 vs 1085 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3561 vs 1104 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.53 vs 0.308 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 57.448 vs 20.342 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.731 vs 0.436 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.909 vs 2.227 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.313 vs 0.082 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Extreme X7900
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 2% lower typical power consumption: 44 Watt vs 45 Watt
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1485 vs 509
- Around 30% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 2396 vs 1837
| Specifications (specs) | |
| L2 cache | 4 MB vs 1 MB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 44 Watt vs 45 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1485 vs 509 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 2396 vs 1837 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i7-2630QM
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Extreme X7900
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i7-2630QM | Intel Core 2 Extreme X7900 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1227 | 1085 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 3561 | 1104 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 509 | 1485 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1837 | 2396 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.53 | 0.308 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 57.448 | 20.342 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.731 | 0.436 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.909 | 2.227 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.313 | 0.082 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core i7-2630QM | Intel Core 2 Extreme X7900 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge | Merom |
| Launch date | 3 January 2011 | 1 September 2007 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $185 | $851 |
| Place in performance rating | 2725 | 2741 |
| Price now | $108.24 | |
| Processor Number | i7-2630QM | X7900 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 15.06 | |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.00 GHz | 2.80 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | 800 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 216 mm | 143 mm2 |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 C | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.90 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 8 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 995 Million | 291 million |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 800 MHz | |
| VID voltage range | 1.100V-1.375V | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.3 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 1066/1333 | DDR1 |
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0x116 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 650 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.10 GHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.1 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 3000 | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| CRT | ||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 2 | |
| SDVO | ||
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5 (rPGA998) | 35mm x 35mm |
| Sockets supported | FCPGA988 | PPGA478 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 44 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® My WiFi technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Intel® Active Management technology (AMT) | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core i7-2630QM with others
IntelCore i7-2630QM vs
IntelCore 2 Extreme X7900
IntelCore i7-2630QM vs
IntelPentium 4405Y
IntelCore i7-2630QM vs
IntelCeleron 827E
