Intel Core i7-3687U versus Intel Pentium 2020M
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Core i7-3687U et Intel Pentium 2020M pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Mémoire, Graphiques, Interfaces de graphiques, Compatibilité, Périphériques, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core i7-3687U
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 3 mois plus tard
- 2 plus de fils: 4 versus 2
- Environ 38% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 3.30 GHz versus 2.4 GHz
- Environ 17% température maximale du noyau plus haut: 105 °C versus 90 °C
- 2x plus de la cache L3, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L3 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- 2.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 17 Watt versus 35 Watt
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 1598 versus 1268
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 2645 versus 1379
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 571 versus 426
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1207 versus 796
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.2 versus 2.116
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2517 versus 2189
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2517 versus 2189
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 January 2013 versus 1 October 2012 |
| Nombre de fils | 4 versus 2 |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.30 GHz versus 2.4 GHz |
| Température de noyau maximale | 105 °C versus 90 °C |
| Cache L3 | 4 MB versus 2048 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt versus 35 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1598 versus 1268 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2645 versus 1379 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 571 versus 426 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1207 versus 796 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.2 versus 2.116 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2517 versus 2189 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2517 versus 2189 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Pentium 2020M
- 18.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 70.755 versus 3.896
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.372 versus 0.194
- 3.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 3.787 versus 0.967
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.032 versus 1.42
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 70.755 versus 3.896 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.372 versus 0.194 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.787 versus 0.967 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.032 versus 1.42 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Core i7-3687U
CPU 2: Intel Pentium 2020M
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Core i7-3687U | Intel Pentium 2020M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1598 | 1268 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2645 | 1379 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 571 | 426 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1207 | 796 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.2 | 2.116 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3.896 | 70.755 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.194 | 0.372 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.967 | 3.787 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.42 | 4.032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2517 | 2189 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2517 | 2189 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Core i7-3687U | Intel Pentium 2020M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Ivy Bridge | Ivy Bridge |
| Date de sortie | 1 January 2013 | 1 October 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 2483 | 2471 |
| Processor Number | i7-3687U | 2020M |
| Série | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors | Intel® Pentium® Processor 2000 Series |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Segment vertical | Mobile | Mobile |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $134 | |
| Prix maintenant | $134 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 5.01 | |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 2.10 GHz | 2.40 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | 5 GT/s DMI |
| Taille de dé | 118 mm | 118 mm |
| Cache L1 | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| Cache L2 | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| Cache L3 | 4 MB | 2048 KB |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Température de noyau maximale | 105 °C | 90 °C |
| Fréquence maximale | 3.30 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 4 | 2 |
| Compte de transistor | 1400 million | |
Mémoire |
||
| Réseaux de mémoire maximale | 2 | 2 |
| Bande passante de mémoire maximale | 25.6 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| Genres de mémoire soutenus | DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 | DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 |
Graphiques |
||
| Device ID | 0x166 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.20 GHz | 1.10 GHz |
| Freéquency maximale des graphiques | 1.2 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video HD | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Technologie Intel® InTru™ 3D | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Graphiques du processeur | Intel® HD Graphics 4000 | Intel HD Graphics |
| Technologie Intel® Clear Video | ||
Interfaces de graphiques |
||
| CRT | ||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans soutenu | 3 | 3 |
| SDVO | ||
| Soutien du Wireless Display (WiDi) | ||
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Nombre de CPUs maximale dans une configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 31.0 x 24.0mm (BGA1023) | 37.5mm x 37.5mm (rPGA988B) |
| Prise courants soutenu | FCBGA1023 | FCPGA988 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 17 Watt | 35 Watt |
Périphériques |
||
| Nombre maximale des voies PCIe | 16 | 16 |
| Révision PCI Express | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 | 1x16, 2x8, 1x8 2x4 |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Technologie Anti-Theft | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Identity Protection | ||
| Technologie Intel® Secure Key | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Extensions de l’ensemble d’instructions | Intel® AVX | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
| Technologie Intel® My WiFi | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Core i7-3687U avec des autres
IntelCore i7-3687U vs
IntelCore i7-840QM
IntelCore i7-3687U vs
IntelCore i7-2860QM
IntelCore i7-3687U vs
IntelCore i7-2637M
IntelCore i7-3687U vs
AMDE2-9000e
IntelCore i7-3687U vs
AMDGX-420CA
IntelCore i7-3687U vs
AMDA4-9120e
