Intel Core i7-8565U vs Intel Xeon E5-2670
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i7-8565U and Intel Xeon E5-2670 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-8565U
- CPU is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 39% higher clock speed: 4.60 GHz vs 3.30 GHz
- Around 25% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 80.0°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 32 nm
- 7.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 115 Watt
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2127 vs 1489
- 8x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 4787 vs 602
- 2.8x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 13130 vs 4635
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.452 vs 7.119
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 90.519 vs 88.939
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 4.346 vs 3.609
- 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 30.312 vs 8.475
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 21 August 2018 vs March 2012 |
| Maximum frequency | 4.60 GHz vs 3.30 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 80.0°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 32 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 115 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2127 vs 1489 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 4787 vs 602 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 13130 vs 4635 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.452 vs 7.119 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 90.519 vs 88.939 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.346 vs 3.609 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.312 vs 8.475 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon E5-2670
- 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 8 vs 4
- 8 more threads: 16 vs 8
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2.5x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- 12x more maximum memory size: 384 GB vs 32 GB
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 15492 vs 6014
- Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.885 vs 0.666
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 8 vs 4 |
| Number of threads | 16 vs 8 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) vs 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) vs 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 20480 KB (shared) vs 8 MB |
| Maximum memory size | 384 GB vs 32 GB |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 vs 1 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 15492 vs 6014 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.885 vs 0.666 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i7-8565U
CPU 2: Intel Xeon E5-2670
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i7-8565U | Intel Xeon E5-2670 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2127 | 1489 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 6014 | 15492 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 4787 | 602 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 13130 | 4635 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 2957 | 0 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.452 | 7.119 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 90.519 | 88.939 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.666 | 0.885 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.346 | 3.609 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.312 | 8.475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1865 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3556 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6194 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1865 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3556 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6194 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core i7-8565U | Intel Xeon E5-2670 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Whiskey Lake | Sandy Bridge EP |
| Launch date | 21 August 2018 | March 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 829 | 2226 |
| Processor Number | i7-8565U | E5-2670 |
| Series | 8th Generation Intel® Core™ i7 Processors | Intel® Xeon® Processor E5 Family |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Server |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $145 | |
| Price now | $96.48 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 37.05 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.80 GHz | 2.60 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 4 GT/s OPI | 8 GT/s QPI |
| Die size | 123 mm | 435 mm |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 20480 KB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 80.0°C |
| Maximum frequency | 4.60 GHz | 3.30 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
| Number of threads | 8 | 16 |
| Number of QPI Links | 2 | |
| Transistor count | 2270 million | |
| VID voltage range | 0.60V-1.35V | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 384 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR3 800/1066/1333/1600 |
| ECC memory support | ||
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0x3EA0 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.15 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 32 GB | |
| Processor graphics | Intel® UHD Graphics 620 | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
Graphics image quality |
||
| 4K resolution support | ||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Configurable TDP-down | 10 W | |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 800 MHz | |
| Configurable TDP-up | 25 W | |
| Configurable TDP-up Frequency | 2.00 GHz | |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Package Size | 46x24 | 52.5mm x 45.0mm |
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1528 | FCLGA2011 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 115 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | 40 |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4, 2x2, 1x2+2x1 and 4x1 | |
| Scalability | 2S Only | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® AVX |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® My WiFi technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Smart Response technology | ||
| Intel® Thermal Velocity Boost | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Speed Shift technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core i7-8565U with others
IntelCore i7-8565U vs
IntelXeon E-2278GE
IntelCore i7-8565U vs
AMDRyzen 5 4600HS
IntelCore i7-8565U vs
IntelCore i5-1145G7
IntelCore i7-8565U vs
AMDRyzen Embedded V2718
IntelCore i7-8565U vs
IntelCore i5-1230U
IntelCore i7-8565U vs
AMDRyzen 5 7520U
