Intel Core i9-10850K vs AMD PRO A4-8350B
Comparative analysis of Intel Core i9-10850K and AMD PRO A4-8350B processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i9-10850K
- 8 more cores, run more applications at once: 10 vs 2
- 18 more threads: 20 vs 2
- Around 33% higher clock speed: 5.20 GHz vs 3.9 GHz
- Around 40% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 71.30°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 3076 vs 1438
- 13.5x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 22328 vs 1649
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2107 vs 1213
- Around 74% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2107 vs 1213
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 10 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 20 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 5.20 GHz vs 3.9 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 71.30°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 3076 vs 1438 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 22328 vs 1649 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2107 vs 1213 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2107 vs 1213 |
Reasons to consider the AMD PRO A4-8350B
- Around 92% lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 125 Watt
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2028 vs 1228
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2028 vs 1228
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5655 vs 2139
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5655 vs 2139
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 125 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2028 vs 1228 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2028 vs 1228 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5655 vs 2139 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5655 vs 2139 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Core i9-10850K
CPU 2: AMD PRO A4-8350B
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Core i9-10850K | AMD PRO A4-8350B |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 3076 | 1438 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 22328 | 1649 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 8789 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2107 | 1213 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2107 | 1213 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1228 | 2028 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1228 | 2028 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2139 | 5655 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2139 | 5655 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Core i9-10850K | AMD PRO A4-8350B | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Comet Lake | |
| Launch date | 18 Aug 2020 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $453 - $464 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1114 | 1106 |
| Processor Number | i9-10850K | |
| Series | 10th Generation Intel Core i9 Processors | AMD PRO A-Series A4 APU for Desktops |
| Status | Launched | |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Family | AMD PRO A-Series Processors | |
| OPN Tray | AD835BYBI23JC | |
| OS Support | Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition, Windows 7 - 64-Bit Edition, RHEL x86 64-Bit, Ubuntu x86 64-Bit | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 3.60 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 8 GT/s | |
| L3 cache | 20 MB | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 71.30°C |
| Maximum frequency | 5.20 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Number of cores | 10 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 20 | 2 |
| Compute Cores | 6 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | |
| Number of GPU cores | 4 | |
| Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | |
| Supported memory frequency | 1866 MHz | |
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0x9BC5 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.20 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 64 GB | |
| Processor graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics |
| Enduro | ||
| Graphics max frequency | 757 MHz | |
| iGPU core count | 256 | |
| Switchable graphics | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Codec Engine (VCE) | ||
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
| DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Graphics image quality |
||
| 4K resolution support | ||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2160@30Hz | |
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Configurable TDP-down | 95 Watt | |
| Configurable TDP-down Frequency | 3.30 GHz | |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1200 | FM2+ |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015D | |
| Configurable TDP | 45 Watt/65 Watt | |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel SSE4.1, Intel SSE4.2, Intel AVX2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® Thermal Velocity Boost | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| AMD App Acceleration | ||
| AMD Elite Experiences | ||
| AMD Mantle API | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP) | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| Fused Multiply-Add 4 (FMA4) | ||
| Heterogeneous System Architecture (HSA) | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Out-of-band client management | ||
| PowerGating | ||
| PowerNow | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| RAID | ||
| System Image Stability | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
| IOMMU 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Core i9-10850K with others
IntelCore i9-10850K vs
IntelCore i7-7700
IntelCore i9-10850K vs
AMDRyzen 3 PRO 3200G
IntelCore i9-10850K vs
AMDRyzen 3 3200GE
IntelCore i9-10850K vs
AMDAthlon Gold PRO 3150G
IntelCore i9-10850K vs
IntelCore i5-10400T
IntelCore i9-10850K vs
IntelPentium Gold G6505T
