Intel Pentium 4425Y vs Intel Celeron 3965U
Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium 4425Y and Intel Celeron 3965U processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium 4425Y
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 15 Watt
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1200 vs 894
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2108 vs 1741
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3977 vs 3215
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1200 vs 894
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2108 vs 1741
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3977 vs 3215
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt vs 15 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1200 vs 894 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2108 vs 1741 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3977 vs 3215 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1200 vs 894 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2108 vs 1741 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3977 vs 3215 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron 3965U
- 2x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 16 GB
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1339 vs 952
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1732 vs 1689
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 16 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1339 vs 952 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1732 vs 1689 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Pentium 4425Y
CPU 2: Intel Celeron 3965U
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Pentium 4425Y | Intel Celeron 3965U |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 952 | 1339 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1689 | 1732 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 11.633 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 130.749 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.828 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.099 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 16.23 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1200 | 894 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2108 | 1741 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3977 | 3215 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1200 | 894 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2108 | 1741 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3977 | 3215 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Pentium 4425Y | Intel Celeron 3965U | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Kaby Lake | Kaby Lake |
| Launch date | Q1'19 | 1 March 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 1515 | 1516 |
| Processor Number | 4425Y | 3965U |
| Series | Intel® Pentium® Processor 4000 Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor 3000 Series |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | |
| Price now | $107 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 6.64 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.70 GHz | 2.20 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 4 GT/s QPI | 4 GT/s OPI |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | 100°C |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 2 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.2 GHz | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 29.8 GB/s | 34.1 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| Supported memory types | LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 | DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 |
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0x591E | 0x5906 |
| Graphics base frequency | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 850 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 16 GB | 32 GB |
| Graphics max frequency | 900 MHz | |
| Processor graphics | Intel® HD Graphics 610 | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
Graphics image quality |
||
| 4K resolution support | ||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | 4096x2304@60Hz |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | 4096x2304@24Hz |
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Compatibility |
||
| Configurable TDP-down | 4.5 W | 10 W |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 20mm X 16.5mm | 42mm X 24mm |
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1515 | FCBGA1356 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 10 | 10 |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4, 2x2, 1x2+2x1 and 4x1 | 1x4, 2x2, 1x2+2x1 and 4x1 |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® My WiFi technology | ||
| Intel® Smart Response technology | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Speed Shift technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Pentium 4425Y with others
IntelPentium 4425Y vs
IntelCeleron 3965U
IntelPentium 4425Y vs
AMDRX-427BB
IntelPentium 4425Y vs
AMDRyzen 5 PRO 3500U
IntelPentium 4425Y vs
IntelCore i7-8665UE
IntelPentium 4425Y vs
IntelCore i7-10510Y
IntelPentium 4425Y vs
AMDRyzen Embedded R1305G
