Intel Pentium Dual Core T2410 vs Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500
Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium Dual Core T2410 and Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium Dual Core T2410
- CPU is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 7% higher clock speed: 2 GHz vs 1.87 GHz
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 712 vs 661
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 566 vs 548
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 September 2008 vs 1 May 2008 |
Maximum frequency | 2 GHz vs 1.87 GHz |
L2 cache | 1024 KB vs 512 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 712 vs 661 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 566 vs 548 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Pentium Dual Core T2410
CPU 2: Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
Name | Intel Pentium Dual Core T2410 | Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 712 | 661 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 566 | 548 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2410 | Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1500 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Merom | Merom |
Launch date | 1 September 2008 | 1 May 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 2689 | 2754 |
Series | Intel Pentium Dual Core | Intel Celeron Dual-Core |
Vertical segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 111 mm | |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 533 MHz | 533 MHz |
L2 cache | 1024 KB | 512 KB |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Maximum frequency | 2 GHz | 1.87 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
Compatibility |
||
Sockets supported | P, 478Pin | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 35 Watt |