Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 versus Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
Analyse comparative des processeurs Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 et Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 pour tous les caractéristiques dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Performance, Compatibilité, Sécurité & fiabilité, Technologies élevé, Virtualization. Analyse de référence de la performance des processeurs: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500
- CPU est plus nouveau: date de sortie 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 2% vitesse de fonctionnement plus vite: 2.3 GHz versus 2.26 GHz
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.058 versus 0.049
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.639 versus 1.273
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 10 January 2009 versus 15 July 2008 |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.3 GHz versus 2.26 GHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.058 versus 0.049 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.639 versus 1.273 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
- 3x plus de la cache L2, le plus d’info qui peut être entreposé dans la cache L2 pour l’accès facil plus tard
- Environ 40% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 25 Watt versus 35 Watt
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - Single thread mark: 920 versus 904
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - CPU mark: 849 versus 824
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 302 versus 272
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 517 versus 474
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.23 versus 0.226
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 13.234 versus 7.743
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.446 versus 0.387
| Caractéristiques | |
| Cache L2 | 3072 KB versus 1024 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt versus 35 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 920 versus 904 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 849 versus 824 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 302 versus 272 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 517 versus 474 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.23 versus 0.226 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 13.234 versus 7.743 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.446 versus 0.387 |
Comparer les références
CPU 1: Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo P8400
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 | Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 904 | 920 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 824 | 849 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 272 | 302 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 474 | 517 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.226 | 0.23 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7.743 | 13.234 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.058 | 0.049 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.387 | 0.446 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.639 | 1.273 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 | Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Nom de code de l’architecture | Penryn | Penryn |
| Date de sortie | 10 January 2009 | 15 July 2008 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 3227 | 3212 |
| Processor Number | T4500 | P8400 |
| Série | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Segment vertical | Mobile | Mobile |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $209 | |
| Prix maintenant | $297.01 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 1.44 | |
Performance |
||
| Soutien de 64-bit | ||
| Base frequency | 2.30 GHz | 2.26 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB | 1066 MHz FSB |
| Taille de dé | 107 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 800 MHz | 1066 MHz |
| Cache L1 | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| Cache L2 | 1024 KB | 3072 KB |
| Processus de fabrication | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Fréquence maximale | 2.3 GHz | 2.26 GHz |
| Nombre de noyaux | 2 | 2 |
| Nombre de fils | 2 | 2 |
| Compte de transistor | 410 million | 410 million |
| Température de noyau maximale | 105°C | |
| Rangée de tension VID | 1.050V-1.150V | |
Compatibilité |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Prise courants soutenu | PGA478 | PGA478, BGA479 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Package Size | 35 mm x 35mm | |
Sécurité & fiabilité |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Technologie Intel® Trusted Execution (TXT) | ||
Technologies élevé |
||
| Technologie Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Technologie Intel® Turbo Boost | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Technologie Intel® Hyper-Threading | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un CPU
Comparer les processeurs
Comparer Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 avec des autres
IntelPentium Dual Core T4500 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo T7600
IntelPentium Dual Core T4500 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo P7450
IntelPentium Dual Core T4500 vs
IntelAtom N470
