Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T7600
Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 and Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 911 vs 869
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 829 vs 801
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 272 vs 268
- Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 0.387 vs 0.35
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB vs 64 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 911 vs 869 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 829 vs 801 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 272 vs 268 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 474 vs 472 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.387 vs 0.35 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Duo T7600
- Around 1% higher clock speed: 2.33 GHz vs 2.3 GHz
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 3% lower typical power consumption: 34 Watt vs 35 Watt
- Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.245 vs 0.226
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 16.014 vs 7.743
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.072 vs 0.058
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1.698 vs 1.639
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum frequency | 2.33 GHz vs 2.3 GHz |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB vs 1024 KB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 34 Watt vs 35 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.245 vs 0.226 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 16.014 vs 7.743 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.072 vs 0.058 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.698 vs 1.639 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Duo T7600
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 | Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 911 | 869 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 829 | 801 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 272 | 268 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 474 | 472 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.226 | 0.245 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7.743 | 16.014 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.058 | 0.072 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.387 | 0.35 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.639 | 1.698 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 | Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Penryn | Merom |
| Launch date | 10 January 2009 | Q3'07 |
| Place in performance rating | 3140 | 3143 |
| Processor Number | T4500 | T7600 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Vertical segment | Mobile | Mobile |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $619 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.30 GHz | 2.33 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 800 MHz FSB | 667 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 143 mm2 |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 800 MHz | 667 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB | 4096 KB |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 2.3 GHz | 2.33 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 2 |
| Transistor count | 410 million | 291 million |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C | |
| VID voltage range | 1.0375V-1.300V | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Sockets supported | PGA478 | PPGA478, PBGA479 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 34 Watt |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
| Package Size | 35mm x 35mm | |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 0 W | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Pentium Dual Core T4500 with others
IntelPentium Dual Core T4500 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo T7600
IntelPentium Dual Core T4500 vs
IntelCore 2 Duo T7500
IntelPentium Dual Core T4500 vs
IntelAtom N470
