Intel Pentium G3220 vs Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300
Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium G3220 and Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium G3220
- CPU is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 20% higher clock speed: 3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz
- Around 1% higher maximum core temperature: 72°C vs 71.4°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 22 nm vs 45 nm
- Around 79% lower typical power consumption: 53 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1688 vs 1061
- Around 85% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 623 vs 337
- Around 7% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1136 vs 1061
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 1.203 vs 0.538
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 33.68 vs 15.964
- Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.191 vs 0.135
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | September 2013 vs November 2008 |
| Maximum frequency | 3 GHz vs 2.5 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 72°C vs 71.4°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 45 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 53 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1688 vs 1061 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 623 vs 337 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1136 vs 1061 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.203 vs 0.538 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 33.68 vs 15.964 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.191 vs 0.135 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 8x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1906 vs 1883
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| L1 cache | 256 KB vs 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB vs 256 KB (per core) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1906 vs 1883 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Pentium G3220
CPU 2: Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Pentium G3220 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1688 | 1061 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1883 | 1906 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 623 | 337 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1136 | 1061 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 1.203 | 0.538 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 33.68 | 15.964 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.191 | 0.135 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 658 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1371 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2524 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 658 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1371 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2524 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.117 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.999 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Pentium G3220 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q8300 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Haswell | Yorkfield |
| Launch date | September 2013 | November 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $71 | |
| Place in performance rating | 2164 | 3088 |
| Price now | $119.95 | $49.99 |
| Processor Number | G3220 | Q8300 |
| Series | Intel® Pentium® Processor G Series | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 7.69 | 17.60 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 3.00 GHz | 2.50 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI2 | 1333 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 177 mm | 164 mm2 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 4096 KB |
| L3 cache | 3072 KB (shared) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | 71 °C |
| Maximum core temperature | 72°C | 71.4°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 2 | |
| Transistor count | 1400 million | 456 million |
| VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3625V | |
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Max memory channels | 2 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21.3 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1333, DDR3L-1333 @ 1.5V | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.10 GHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.1 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 1.7 GB | |
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| DVI | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
| VGA | ||
Graphics image quality |
||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 2560x1600@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over eDP | 2560x1600@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 1920x1080@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over VGA | 1920x1200@60Hz | |
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 11.1/12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1150 | LGA775 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 53 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2013C | |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 16 | |
| PCI Express revision | Up to 3.0 | |
| PCIe configurations | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 | |
| Scalability | 1S Only | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Pentium G3220 with others
IntelPentium G3220 vs
AMDAthlon X2 4850e
IntelPentium G3220 vs
AMDPhenom II X3 B73
IntelPentium G3220 vs
AMDAthlon II X2 210e
IntelPentium G3220 vs
IntelCore i7-990X
IntelPentium G3220 vs
IntelCore i3-4130T
IntelPentium G3220 vs
IntelCeleron J4115
