Intel Pentium G860 vs Intel Core i7-920
Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium G860 and Intel Core i7-920 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium G860
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher clock speed: 3 GHz vs 2.93 GHz
- Around 2% higher maximum core temperature: 69.1°C vs 67.9°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 45 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 24 GB
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 130 Watt
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1393 vs 1217
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 524 vs 469
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 15 September 2011 vs November 2008 |
| Maximum frequency | 3 GHz vs 2.93 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 69.1°C vs 67.9°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 45 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 24 GB |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 130 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1393 vs 1217 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 524 vs 469 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i7-920
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 6 more threads: 8 vs 2
- 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2.7x more L3 cache, more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- Around 95% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2839 vs 1459
- Around 96% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1855 vs 947
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.873 vs 0.683
- 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 50.388 vs 21.937
- Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.3 vs 0.163
- Around 71% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4 vs 2.336
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 8 vs 2 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) vs 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) vs 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 8192 KB (shared) vs 3072 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2839 vs 1459 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1855 vs 947 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.873 vs 0.683 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 50.388 vs 21.937 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.3 vs 0.163 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4 vs 2.336 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Pentium G860
CPU 2: Intel Core i7-920
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Pentium G860 | Intel Core i7-920 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1393 | 1217 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1459 | 2839 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 524 | 469 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 947 | 1855 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.683 | 0.873 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 21.937 | 50.388 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.163 | 0.3 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2.336 | 4 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 2227 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.595 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Pentium G860 | Intel Core i7-920 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge | Bloomfield |
| Launch date | 15 September 2011 | November 2008 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $75 | $340 |
| Place in performance rating | 2832 | 2803 |
| Price now | $29.99 | $174 |
| Processor Number | G860 | i7-920 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Pentium® Processor | Legacy Intel® Core™ Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Value for money (0-100) | 26.93 | 8.34 |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 3.00 GHz | 2.66 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 5 GT/s DMI | 4.8 GT/s QPI |
| Die size | 131 mm | 263 mm2 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 3072 KB | 8192 KB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 69.1°C | 67.9°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3 GHz | 2.93 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 4 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 8 |
| Transistor count | 504 Million | 731 million |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 1333 MHz | |
| Number of QPI Links | 1 | |
| VID voltage range | 0.800V-1.375V | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 3 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 24 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 1066/1333 | DDR3 800/1066 |
Graphics |
||
| Graphics base frequency | 850 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.10 GHz | |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.1 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Flexible Display Interface (Intel® FDI) | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Processor graphics | Intel HD Graphics | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 2 | |
| Wireless Display (WiDi) support | ||
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | 42.5mm x 45.0mm |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1155 | FCLGA1366 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 130 Watt |
Peripherals |
||
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Flexible Display interface (FDI) | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® SSE4.2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Fast Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 36-bit | |
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Pentium G860 with others
IntelPentium G860 vs
IntelPentium 4 2.53
IntelPentium G860 vs
IntelCeleron 2.60
IntelPentium G860 vs
AMDSempron X2 2200
IntelPentium G860 vs
AMDAthlon X2 7750 BE
IntelPentium G860 vs
AMDFX-6100
IntelPentium G860 vs
IntelCeleron J3355
