Intel Pentium J3710 vs Intel Celeron N4000
Comparative analysis of Intel Pentium J3710 and Intel Celeron N4000 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics API support, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics image quality. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Pentium J3710
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- Around 2% higher clock speed: 2.64 GHz vs 2.60 GHz
- Around 4% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 707 vs 680
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1418 vs 1322
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2514 vs 1853
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1418 vs 1322
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2514 vs 1853
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.64 GHz vs 2.60 GHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 707 vs 680 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1418 vs 1322 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2514 vs 1853 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1418 vs 1322 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2514 vs 1853 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Celeron N4000
- Around 17% higher maximum core temperature: 105 °C vs 90°C
- Around 17% lower typical power consumption: 6 Watt vs 6.5 Watt
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1037 vs 696
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1428 vs 1403
- Around 72% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 388 vs 225
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C vs 90°C |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt vs 6.5 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1037 vs 696 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1428 vs 1403 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 388 vs 225 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Pentium J3710
CPU 2: Intel Celeron N4000
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Pentium J3710 | Intel Celeron N4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 696 | 1037 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1403 | 1428 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 225 | 388 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 707 | 680 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.574 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 9.071 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.116 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.409 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1.744 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1418 | 1322 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2514 | 1853 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1418 | 1322 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2514 | 1853 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 583 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 583 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Pentium J3710 | Intel Celeron N4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Braswell | Gemini Lake |
| Launch date | Q1'16 | 11 December 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 2586 | 2250 |
| Processor Number | J3710 | N4000 |
| Series | Intel® Pentium® Processor J Series | Intel® Celeron® Processor N Series |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Vertical segment | Desktop | Mobile |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $107 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 1.60 GHz | 1.10 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 90°C | 105 °C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.64 GHz | 2.60 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 4 | 2 |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | |
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR3L-1600 | DDR4/LPDDR4 upto 2400 MT/s |
Graphics |
||
| Execution Units | 18 | 12 |
| Graphics base frequency | 400 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Graphics max frequency | 740 MHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Device ID | 0x3185 | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 650 MHz | |
| Processor graphics | Intel® UHD Graphics 600 | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| DisplayPort | ||
| eDP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
| MIPI-DSI | ||
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | Yes | 12 |
| OpenGL | Yes | 4.4 |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 25mm x 27mm | 25mm x 24mm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6.5 Watt | 6 Watt |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 4.8 W | |
| Sockets supported | FCBGA1090 | |
| Thermal Solution | 105 deg C | |
Peripherals |
||
| Integrated LAN | ||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 4 | 6 |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | 2 |
| Number of USB ports | 5 | 8 |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCIe configurations | 1x4/2x2/1x2 + 2x1/4x1 | 1x4 + 1x2 or 4x1 or 2x1+1x2 + 1x2 |
| Total number of SATA ports | 5 | 2 |
| UART | ||
| USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | 2.0/3.0 |
| Integrated Wireless | Intel® Wireless-AC MAC | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Anti-Theft technology | ||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| 4G WiMAX Wireless | ||
| General-Purpose Input/Output (GPIO) | ||
| HD Audio | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Rapid Storage technology (RST) | ||
| Intel® Smart Response technology | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Smart Connect | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Speed Shift technology | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Itanium (VT-i) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Graphics image quality |
||
| 4K resolution support | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Pentium J3710 with others
IntelPentium J3710 vs
IntelCore i7-980X
IntelPentium J3710 vs
IntelPentium E5700
IntelPentium J3710 vs
IntelCore i5-2310
IntelPentium J3710 vs
AMDAthlon II X3 460
IntelPentium J3710 vs
AMDFX-4170
IntelPentium J3710 vs
AMDFX-4150
