Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 vs Intel Core i9-9900K
Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 and Intel Core i9-9900K processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Graphics, Graphics interfaces, Graphics image quality, Graphics API support. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
- 4 more cores, run more applications at once: 12 vs 8
- 8 more threads: 24 vs 16
- 6x more maximum memory size: 768 GB vs 128 GB
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 22166 vs 18182
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 12 vs 8 |
| Number of threads | 24 vs 16 |
| Maximum memory size | 768 GB vs 128 GB |
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 vs 1 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 22166 vs 18182 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Core i9-9900K
- Processor is unlocked, an unlocked multiplier allows for easier overclocking
- Around 61% higher clock speed: 5.00 GHz vs 3.10 GHz
- Around 18% higher maximum core temperature: 100°C vs 84.5°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 14 nm vs 22 nm
- Around 26% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 72% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 2922 vs 1694
- Around 90% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1336 vs 705
- Around 25% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 8781 vs 7047
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Unlocked | Unlocked vs Locked |
| Maximum frequency | 5.00 GHz vs 3.10 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 100°C vs 84.5°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 22 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 120 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 2922 vs 1694 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1336 vs 705 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 8781 vs 7047 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
CPU 2: Intel Core i9-9900K
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
| Name | Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 | Intel Core i9-9900K |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1694 | 2922 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 22166 | 18182 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 705 | 1336 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 7047 | 8781 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 7011 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.968 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 202.925 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.504 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.779 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.406 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2165 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4003 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6679 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2165 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4003 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6679 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 | Intel Core i9-9900K | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Haswell | Coffee Lake |
| Launch date | Q3'14 | October 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 1411 | 792 |
| Processor Number | E5-2670V3 | i9-9900K |
| Series | Intel® Xeon® Processor E5 v3 Family | 9th Generation Intel® Core™ i9 Processors |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
| Vertical segment | Server | Desktop |
| Price now | $909 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 6.63 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.30 GHz | 3.60 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 9.6 GT/s QPI | 8 GT/s DMI3 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 84.5°C | 100°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.10 GHz | 5.00 GHz |
| Number of cores | 12 | 8 |
| Number of QPI Links | 2 | |
| Number of threads | 24 | 16 |
| VID voltage range | 0.65V–1.30V | |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | |
| Unlocked | ||
Memory |
||
| Max memory channels | 4 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 68 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 768 GB | 128 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR4 1600/1866/2133 | DDR4-2666 |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Package Size | 52.5mm x 45mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA2011-3 | FCLGA1151 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Thermal Solution | PCG 2015D (130W) | |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 40 | 16 |
| PCI Express revision | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe configurations | x4, x8, x16 | Up to 1x16, 2x8, 1x8+2x4 |
| Scalability | 2S | 1S Only |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Identity Protection technology | ||
| Intel® OS Guard | ||
| Intel® Secure Key technology | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
| Intel® Memory Protection Extensions (Intel® MPX) | ||
| Intel® Software Guard Extensions (Intel® SGX) | ||
| Secure Boot | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Flex Memory Access | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® TSX-NI | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Intel® vPro™ Platform Eligibility | ||
| Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 46-bit | |
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| Intel® Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX) | ||
| Intel® Optane™ Memory Supported | ||
| Intel® Stable Image Platform Program (SIPP) | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Graphics |
||
| Device ID | 0x3E98 | |
| Graphics base frequency | 350 MHz | |
| Graphics max dynamic frequency | 1.20 GHz | |
| Intel® Clear Video HD technology | ||
| Intel® Clear Video technology | ||
| Intel® InTru™ 3D technology | ||
| Intel® Quick Sync Video | ||
| Max video memory | 64 GB | |
| Processor graphics | Intel® UHD Graphics 630 | |
Graphics interfaces |
||
| Number of displays supported | 3 | |
Graphics image quality |
||
| 4K resolution support | ||
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@24Hz | |
Graphics API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 with others
IntelXeon E5-2670 v3 vs
IntelXeon E3-1275
IntelXeon E5-2670 v3 vs
AMDRyzen 3 PRO 1200
IntelXeon E5-2670 v3 vs
AMDEPYC 7351P
IntelXeon E5-2670 v3 vs
AMDOpteron 3280
IntelXeon E5-2670 v3 vs
IntelXeon E3-1230 v6
IntelXeon E5-2670 v3 vs
IntelXeon E5-2660 v3
