Intel Xeon W3520 vs Intel Xeon 5130

Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon W3520 and Intel Xeon 5130 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon W3520

  • CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
  • Around 47% higher clock speed: 2.93 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Around 4% higher maximum core temperature: 67.9°C vs 65°C
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
  • Around 56% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1272 vs 818
  • Around 76% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2924 vs 1660
  • 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.887 vs 0.436
  • 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 47.416 vs 19.113
  • 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.281 vs 0.097
  • Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.1 vs 3.166
Specifications (specs)
Launch date March 2009 vs June 2006
Number of cores 4 vs 2
Maximum frequency 2.93 GHz vs 2 GHz
Maximum core temperature 67.9°C vs 65°C
Manufacturing process technology 45 nm vs 65 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - Single thread mark 1272 vs 818
PassMark - CPU mark 2924 vs 1660
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 0.887 vs 0.436
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 47.416 vs 19.113
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.281 vs 0.097
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 4.1 vs 3.166

Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon 5130

  • 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
  • 2x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 130 Watt
  • 2.5x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1202 vs 479
  • Around 2% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1950 vs 1908
Specifications (specs)
L2 cache 4096 KB vs 256 KB (per core)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 65 Watt vs 130 Watt
Benchmarks
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 1202 vs 479
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 1950 vs 1908

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: Intel Xeon W3520
CPU 2: Intel Xeon 5130

PassMark - Single thread mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
1272
818
PassMark - CPU mark
CPU 1
CPU 2
2924
1660
Geekbench 4 - Single Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
479
1202
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core
CPU 1
CPU 2
1908
1950
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.887
0.436
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
47.416
19.113
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
0.281
0.097
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
CPU 1
CPU 2
4.1
3.166
Name Intel Xeon W3520 Intel Xeon 5130
PassMark - Single thread mark 1272 818
PassMark - CPU mark 2924 1660
Geekbench 4 - Single Core 479 1202
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core 1908 1950
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 0.887 0.436
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 47.416 19.113
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.281 0.097
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 4.1 3.166
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 1.482

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel Xeon W3520 Intel Xeon 5130

Essentials

Architecture codename Bloomfield Woodcrest
Launch date March 2009 June 2006
Launch price (MSRP) $404 $16
Place in performance rating 2793 2819
Price now $28.75 $13.26
Processor Number W3520 5130
Series Legacy Intel® Xeon® Processors Legacy Intel® Xeon® Processors
Status Discontinued Launched
Value for money (0-100) 51.83 30.61
Vertical segment Server Server

Performance

64 bit support
Base frequency 2.66 GHz 2.00 GHz
Bus Speed 4.8 GT/s QPI 1333 MHz FSB
Die size 263 mm2 143 mm2
L1 cache 64 KB (per core)
L2 cache 256 KB (per core) 4096 KB
L3 cache 8192 KB (shared)
Manufacturing process technology 45 nm 65 nm
Maximum core temperature 67.9°C 65°C
Maximum frequency 2.93 GHz 2 GHz
Number of cores 4 2
Number of QPI Links 1
Number of threads 8
Transistor count 731 million 291 million
VID voltage range 0.800V-1.375V B2=1.00V-1.50V

Memory

ECC memory support
Max memory channels 3
Maximum memory bandwidth 25.6 GB/s
Maximum memory size 24 GB
Supported memory types DDR3 800/1066 DDR2

Compatibility

Low Halogen Options Available
Max number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1
Package Size 42.5mm x 45.0mm 37.5mm x 37.5mm
Sockets supported FCLGA1366 771
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 130 Watt 65 Watt
Scenario Design Power (SDP) 0 W

Security & Reliability

Execute Disable Bit (EDB)
Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT)

Advanced Technologies

Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology
Idle States
Instruction set extensions Intel® SSE4.2
Intel 64
Intel® AES New Instructions
Intel® Demand Based Switching
Intel® Hyper-Threading technology
Intel® Turbo Boost technology
Physical Address Extensions (PAE) 36-bit
Thermal Monitoring
FSB parity

Virtualization

Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x)
Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)