Intel Xeon W3520 vs Intel Xeon 5130
Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon W3520 and Intel Xeon 5130 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon W3520
- CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 2
- Around 47% higher clock speed: 2.93 GHz vs 2 GHz
- Around 4% higher maximum core temperature: 67.9°C vs 65°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1267 vs 817
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 2937 vs 1653
- 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.887 vs 0.436
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 47.416 vs 19.113
- 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.281 vs 0.097
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 4.1 vs 3.166
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | March 2009 vs June 2006 |
| Number of cores | 4 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.93 GHz vs 2 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 67.9°C vs 65°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1267 vs 817 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2937 vs 1653 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.887 vs 0.436 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 47.416 vs 19.113 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.281 vs 0.097 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.1 vs 3.166 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon 5130
- 4x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 130 Watt
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 1202 vs 479
- Around 2% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1950 vs 1908
| Specifications (specs) | |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB vs 256 KB (per core) |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 130 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1202 vs 479 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1950 vs 1908 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Xeon W3520
CPU 2: Intel Xeon 5130
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Xeon W3520 | Intel Xeon 5130 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1267 | 817 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 2937 | 1653 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 479 | 1202 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 1908 | 1950 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.887 | 0.436 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 47.416 | 19.113 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.281 | 0.097 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.1 | 3.166 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 1.482 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Xeon W3520 | Intel Xeon 5130 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Bloomfield | Woodcrest |
| Launch date | March 2009 | June 2006 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $404 | $16 |
| Place in performance rating | 2803 | 2829 |
| Price now | $28.75 | $13.26 |
| Processor Number | W3520 | 5130 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Xeon® Processors | Legacy Intel® Xeon® Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Launched |
| Value for money (0-100) | 51.83 | 30.61 |
| Vertical segment | Server | Server |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.66 GHz | 2.00 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 4.8 GT/s QPI | 1333 MHz FSB |
| Die size | 263 mm2 | 143 mm2 |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 4096 KB |
| L3 cache | 8192 KB (shared) | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 67.9°C | 65°C |
| Maximum frequency | 2.93 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Number of cores | 4 | 2 |
| Number of QPI Links | 1 | |
| Number of threads | 8 | |
| Transistor count | 731 million | 291 million |
| VID voltage range | 0.800V-1.375V | B2=1.00V-1.50V |
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Max memory channels | 3 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 800/1066 | DDR2 |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Package Size | 42.5mm x 45.0mm | 37.5mm x 37.5mm |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1366 | 771 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Scenario Design Power (SDP) | 0 W | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 36-bit | |
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
| FSB parity | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
