Intel Xeon X5260 vs Intel Atom S1260
Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon X5260 and Intel Atom S1260 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization, Memory, Peripherals. Benchmark processor performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon X5260
- Around 14% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 6x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
| L1 cache | 128 KB vs 56 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 6 MB vs 512 KB (per core) |
Reasons to consider the Intel Atom S1260
- CPU is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 2 more threads: 4 vs 2
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 45 nm
- 8.9x lower typical power consumption: 8.5 Watt vs 80 Watt
| Launch date | December 2012 vs 11 Nov 2007 |
| Number of threads | 4 vs 2 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 45 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 8.5 Watt vs 80 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Xeon X5260
CPU 2: Intel Atom S1260
| Name | Intel Xeon X5260 | Intel Atom S1260 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.436 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 31.038 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.121 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.907 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.139 | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 313 | |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 526 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Xeon X5260 | Intel Atom S1260 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Wolfdale | Centerton |
| Launch date | 11 Nov 2007 | December 2012 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $851 | $64 |
| Place in performance rating | 3299 | 3226 |
| Processor Number | X5260 | S1260 |
| Series | Legacy Intel Xeon Processors | Intel® Atom™ Processor S Series |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
| Vertical segment | Server | Server |
| Price now | $64 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 4.22 | |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 3.33 GHz | 2.00 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 1333 MHz | |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 56 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 6 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 66°C | |
| Number of cores | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 2 | 4 |
| Transistor count | 410 million | |
| VID voltage range | 0.8500V-1.3500V | |
| Maximum frequency | 2 GHz | |
Compatibility |
||
| Package Size | 37.5mm x 37.5mm | |
| Sockets supported | LGA771 | FCBGA1283 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 8.5 Watt |
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| FSB parity | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Max memory channels | 1 | |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 10.6 GB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 1333 | |
Peripherals |
||
| Max number of PCIe lanes | 8 | |
| PCI Express revision | 2.0 | |
| PCI support | ||
| UART | ||
