Intel Xeon X5670 vs Intel Xeon E5520
Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon X5670 and Intel Xeon E5520 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon X5670
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 2 more cores, run more applications at once: 6 vs 4
- 4 more threads: 12 vs 8
- Around 32% higher clock speed: 3.33 GHz vs 2.53 GHz
- Around 13% higher maximum core temperature: 81.3°C vs 72°C
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 45 nm
- Around 50% more L1 cache; more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 50% more L3 cache; more data can be stored in the L3 cache for quick access later
- 2x more maximum memory size: 288 GB vs 144 GB
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 1415 vs 1104
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 10890 vs 4642
- Around 42% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 564 vs 397
- Around 67% better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 3291 vs 1969
- Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.874 vs 1.453
- Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.811 vs 0.429
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 3.679 vs 2.436
- Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 13.469 vs 6.95
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | March 2010 vs March 2009 |
| Number of cores | 6 vs 4 |
| Number of threads | 12 vs 8 |
| Maximum frequency | 3.33 GHz vs 2.53 GHz |
| Maximum core temperature | 81.3°C vs 72°C |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 45 nm |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) vs 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) vs 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 12288 KB (shared) vs 8192 KB (shared) |
| Maximum memory size | 288 GB vs 144 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1415 vs 1104 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 10890 vs 4642 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 564 vs 397 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3291 vs 1969 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.874 vs 1.453 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.811 vs 0.429 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.679 vs 2.436 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.469 vs 6.95 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Xeon E5520
- Around 19% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 62.27 vs 56.955
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 62.27 vs 56.955 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: Intel Xeon X5670
CPU 2: Intel Xeon E5520
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | Intel Xeon X5670 | Intel Xeon E5520 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 1415 | 1104 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 10890 | 4642 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 564 | 397 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 3291 | 1969 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Physics Score | 4238 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.874 | 1.453 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 56.955 | 62.27 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.811 | 0.429 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 3.679 | 2.436 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.469 | 6.95 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Xeon X5670 | Intel Xeon E5520 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Westmere EP | Nehalem EP |
| Launch date | March 2010 | March 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $67 | $19 |
| Place in performance rating | 2214 | 2725 |
| Price now | $66.59 | $42.39 |
| Processor Number | X5670 | E5520 |
| Series | Legacy Intel® Xeon® Processors | Legacy Intel® Xeon® Processors |
| Status | Discontinued | Launched |
| Value for money (0-100) | 35.08 | 30.90 |
| Vertical segment | Server | Server |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Base frequency | 2.93 GHz | 2.26 GHz |
| Bus Speed | 6.4 GT/s QPI | 5.86 GT/s QPI |
| Die size | 239 mm | 263 mm2 |
| Front-side bus (FSB) | 6400 MHz | |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 12288 KB (shared) | 8192 KB (shared) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 81.3°C | 72°C |
| Maximum frequency | 3.33 GHz | 2.53 GHz |
| Number of cores | 6 | 4 |
| Number of QPI Links | 2 | 2 |
| Number of threads | 12 | 8 |
| Transistor count | 1170 million | 731 million |
| VID voltage range | 0.750V-1.350V | 0.75V -1.35V |
Memory |
||
| ECC memory support | ||
| Max memory channels | 3 | 3 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 32 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| Maximum memory size | 288 GB | 144 GB |
| Supported memory types | DDR3 800/1066/1333 | DDR3 800/1066 |
Compatibility |
||
| Low Halogen Options Available | ||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 2 |
| Package Size | 42.5mm X 45mm | 42.5mm x 45mm |
| Sockets supported | FCLGA1366 | FCLGA1366 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 80 Watt |
Security & Reliability |
||
| Execute Disable Bit (EDB) | ||
| Intel® Trusted Execution technology (TXT) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
| Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® technology | ||
| Idle States | ||
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | |
| Intel 64 | ||
| Intel® AES New Instructions | ||
| Intel® Demand Based Switching | ||
| Intel® Hyper-Threading technology | ||
| Intel® Turbo Boost technology | ||
| Physical Address Extensions (PAE) | 40-bit | 40-bit |
| Thermal Monitoring | ||
Virtualization |
||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) | ||
| Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) | ||
| Intel® VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare Intel Xeon X5670 with others
IntelXeon X5670 vs
IntelXeon E5640
IntelXeon X5670 vs
IntelXeon E5-2670
IntelXeon X5670 vs
AMDOpteron 6328
IntelXeon X5670 vs
AMDOpteron 6212
IntelXeon X5670 vs
AMDOpteron 3250 HE
IntelXeon X5670 vs
IntelXeon E5-1607 v3
