VIA Nano U2250 vs AMD Phenom II X4 920
Comparative analysis of VIA Nano U2250 and AMD Phenom II X4 920 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Compatibility, Memory. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the VIA Nano U2250
- 12.5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 125 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X4 920
- 3 more cores, run more applications at once: 4 vs 1
- Around 87% higher clock speed: 2.8 GHz vs 1.5 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 45 nm vs 65 nm
- 2x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
Number of cores | 4 vs 1 |
Maximum frequency | 2.8 GHz vs 1.5 GHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 45 nm vs 65 nm |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) vs 1024 KB |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: VIA Nano U2250
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X4 920
Name | VIA Nano U2250 | AMD Phenom II X4 920 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 1130 | |
PassMark - CPU mark | 2156 | |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 1674 | |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 4682 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 3.558 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7.624 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.17 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 0.322 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 3.506 |
Compare specifications (specs)
VIA Nano U2250 | AMD Phenom II X4 920 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Isaiah | Deneb |
Launch date | 1 January 2009 | January 2009 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 2525 |
Series | VIA Nano | |
Vertical segment | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $90 | |
Price now | $66.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 14.95 | |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Front-side bus (FSB) | 800 MHz | |
L2 cache | 1024 KB | 512 KB (per core) |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum frequency | 1.5 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
Number of cores | 1 | 4 |
Number of threads | 1 | |
Die size | 258 mm | |
L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | |
L3 cache | 6144 KB (shared) | |
Transistor count | 758 million | |
Compatibility |
||
Sockets supported | NanoBGA2 | AM3 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 125 Watt |
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 |