AMD Radeon 550 vs AMD FireStream 9270
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 550 and AMD FireStream 9270 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 550
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 47% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 750 MHz
- 1262x more texture fill rate: 37.86 GTexel/s vs 30 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 160 Watt
- Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1885 vs 1341
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 20 Apr 2017 vs 13 November 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 750 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 37.86 GTexel/s vs 30 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 160 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1885 vs 1341 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FireStream 9270
- Around 56% higher pipelines: 800 vs 512
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 7 Gbps effective
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 473 vs 454
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 800 vs 512 |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 7 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 473 vs 454 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 550
GPU 2: AMD FireStream 9270
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 550 | AMD FireStream 9270 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 454 | 473 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1885 | 1341 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 550 | AMD FireStream 9270 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale |
Code name | Lexa | RV770 |
Launch date | 20 Apr 2017 | 13 November 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 285 | 284 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1183 MHz | |
Compute units | 8 | |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 750 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 75.71 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1,211 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,211 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 512 | 800 |
Pixel fill rate | 18.93 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 37.86 GTexel/s | 30 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 160 Watt |
Transistor count | 2200 million | 956 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0b, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm, 5.7 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 10.1 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 56.00 GB/s | 115.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 7 Gbps effective | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |