AMD Radeon 550 vs AMD Radeon R9 M485X
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 550 and AMD Radeon R9 M485X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 550
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 52% higher core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 723 MHz
- 409.1x more texture fill rate: 37.86 GTexel/s vs 92.54 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 465 vs 417
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 20 Apr 2017 vs 15 May 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 723 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 37.86 GTexel/s vs 92.54 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 vs 417 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M485X
- 4x more pipelines: 2048 vs 512
- 4x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.9x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 7 Gbps effective
- Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3661 vs 2099
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 512 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 7 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3661 vs 2099 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 550
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M485X
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 550 | AMD Radeon R9 M485X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 | 417 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2099 | 3661 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 550 | AMD Radeon R9 M485X | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 3.0 |
Code name | Lexa | Amethyst |
Launch date | 20 Apr 2017 | 15 May 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 277 | 274 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1183 MHz | |
Compute units | 8 | |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz | 723 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 75.71 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1,211 GFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,211 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 512 | 2048 |
Pixel fill rate | 18.93 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 37.86 GTexel/s | 92.54 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 2200 million | 5,000 million |
Floating-point performance | 2,961 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0b, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 145 mm, 5.7 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 56.00 GB/s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 7 Gbps effective | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Enduro |