AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) vs Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) and Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2x more boost clock speed: 2200 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 10 nm
Launch date | 3 Jan 2023 vs 2 Sep 2020 |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2200 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 10 nm |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
- 5x more texture fill rate: 88.00 GTexel/s vs 17.60 GTexel/s
- 5x more pipelines: 640 vs 128
Texture fill rate | 88.00 GTexel/s vs 17.60 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 128 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range)
GPU 2: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU
Name | AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5090 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 265 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1103 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1243 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 610M (Dragon Range) | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EU | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Generation 12.0 |
Code name | Dragon Range | Tiger Lake GT2 |
Launch date | 3 Jan 2023 | 2 Sep 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 840 | 1056 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2200 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Compute units | 2 | 80 |
Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 10 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 35.20 GFLOPS (1:16) | 352.0 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1,126 GFLOPS (2:1) | 2.816 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 563.2 GFLOPS | 1408 GFLOPS |
Pipelines | 128 | 640 |
Pixel fill rate | 8.800 GPixel/s | 22.00 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 17.60 GTexel/s | 88.00 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | |
Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | |
Memory bus width | System Shared | |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | |
Memory type | System Shared |