AMD Radeon 780M vs AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 780M and AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 780M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1187 MHz
- Around 65% higher boost clock speed: 2900 MHz vs 1757 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 7 nm
- 8.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 125 Watt
Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 vs 4 Aug 2020 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1187 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2900 MHz vs 1757 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 7 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 125 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT
- Around 21% higher texture fill rate: 168.7 GTexel/s vs 139.2 GTexel/s
- 2x more pipelines: 1536 vs 768
- Around 50% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41722 vs 27793
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 168.7 GTexel/s vs 139.2 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 768 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 41722 vs 27793 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 780M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 780M | AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27793 | 41722 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 879 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6998 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 480 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 780M | AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
Code name | Phoenix | Navi 14 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 | 4 Aug 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 240 | 512 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2900 MHz | 1757 MHz |
Compute units | 12 | 24 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1187 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 7 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 1536 |
Pixel fill rate | 92.80 GPixel/s | 56.22 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 139.2 GTexel/s | 168.7 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 125 Watt |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 337.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 10.80 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.398 TFLOPS | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Transistor count | 6400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 224.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR6 |