AMD Radeon 780M vs AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon 780M and AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 780M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1130 MHz
- Around 86% higher boost clock speed: 2900 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 7 nm
- 10x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 150 Watt
Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 vs 21 Jan 2020 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1130 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2900 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm vs 7 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
- Around 61% higher texture fill rate: 224.6 GTexel/s vs 139.2 GTexel/s
- 3x more pipelines: 2304 vs 768
- 2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64794 vs 27836
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 875 vs 870
- Around 93% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13622 vs 7051
- 2.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7702 vs 2769
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 224.6 GTexel/s vs 139.2 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 768 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64794 vs 27836 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 875 vs 870 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13622 vs 7051 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7702 vs 2769 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon 780M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon 780M | AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27836 | 64794 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 870 | 875 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7051 | 13622 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2769 | 7702 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 207.909 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3560.776 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.486 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 148.938 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1111.648 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13621 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13621 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon 780M | AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
Code name | Phoenix | Navi 10 XLE |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2023 | 21 Jan 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 204 | 205 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $279 | |
Type | Desktop, Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2900 MHz | 1560 MHz |
Compute units | 12 | 36 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1130 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 4 nm | 7 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 92.80 GPixel/s | 99.84 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 139.2 GTexel/s | 224.6 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 150 Watt |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 449.3 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.38 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.188 TFLOPS | |
Transistor count | 10300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 3 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Length | 10.5 inches (267 mm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Width | Dual-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 288.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | System Shared | 192 bit |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Memory type | System Shared | GDDR6 |