AMD Radeon RX 6400 vs ATI Radeon X800 XT Platinum
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6400 and ATI Radeon X800 XT Platinum videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 17 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 3.7x more core clock speed: 1923 MHz vs 520 MHz
- 13389.4x more texture fill rate: 111.4 GTexel/s vs 8.32 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 130 nm
- Around 19% lower typical power consumption: 53 Watt vs 63 Watt
- 16x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 256 MB
- Around 79% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1120 MHz
- 4.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 717 vs 170
- 94.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7651 vs 81
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 Jan 2022 vs 1 March 2004 |
Core clock speed | 1923 MHz vs 520 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 111.4 GTexel/s vs 8.32 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 130 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 53 Watt vs 63 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1120 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 717 vs 170 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7651 vs 81 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6400
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X800 XT Platinum
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6400 | ATI Radeon X800 XT Platinum |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 717 | 170 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7651 | 81 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 176 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33004 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6400 | ATI Radeon X800 XT Platinum | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | R400 |
Code name | Navi 24 | R423 |
Launch date | 19 Jan 2022 | 1 March 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 279 | 1025 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2321 MHz | |
Compute units | 12 | |
Core clock speed | 1923 MHz | 520 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 130 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.130 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.565 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | |
Pixel fill rate | 74.27 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 111.4 GTexel/s | 8.32 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 53 Watt | 63 Watt |
Transistor count | 5400 million | 160 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 9.0c |
OpenCL | 2.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 35.8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1120 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR3 |