AMD Radeon RX 6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6400 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 1923 MHz vs 735 MHz
- 2.2x more boost clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- Around 35% higher texture fill rate: 111.4 GTexel/s vs 82.80 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 42% lower typical power consumption: 53 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 717 vs 497
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 Jan 2022 vs 11 May 2021 |
Core clock speed | 1923 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2321 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 111.4 GTexel/s vs 82.80 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 53 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 717 vs 497 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
- 3.3x more pipelines: 2560 vs 768
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10117 vs 7651
- 2.7x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 469 vs 176
- Around 75% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57885 vs 33004
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 768 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10117 vs 7651 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 469 vs 176 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57885 vs 33004 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6400 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 717 | 497 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7651 | 10117 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 176 | 469 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33004 | 57885 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 229.393 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2082.931 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.561 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 134.68 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 599.217 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16098 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16098 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6400 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
Code name | Navi 24 | GA106 |
Launch date | 19 Jan 2022 | 11 May 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 279 | 276 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2321 MHz | 1035 MHz |
Compute units | 12 | |
Core clock speed | 1923 MHz | 735 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | 82.80 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.130 TFLOPS (2:1) | 5.299 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.565 TFLOPS | 5.299 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 768 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 74.27 GPixel/s | 49.68 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 111.4 GTexel/s | 82.80 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 53 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 5400 million | 12000 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | IGP |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.2 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 192.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |