AMD Radeon RX 6400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 38% higher core clock speed: 1923 MHz vs 1395 MHz
- Around 49% higher boost clock speed: 2321 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 87% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 717 vs 384
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7644 vs 6968
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 Jan 2022 vs 23 April 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1923 MHz vs 1395 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2321 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 12 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 717 vs 384 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7644 vs 6968 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
- Around 17% higher pipelines: 896 vs 768
- 4x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
- 20.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3438 vs 171
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 896 vs 768 |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3438 vs 171 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6400 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 717 | 384 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7644 | 6968 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 171 | 3438 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32978 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6400 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
Code name | Navi 24 | TU117 |
Launch date | 19 Jan 2022 | 23 April 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 265 | 267 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2321 MHz | 1560 MHz |
Compute units | 12 | |
Core clock speed | 1923 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.8 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.130 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.565 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 896 |
Pixel fill rate | 74.27 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 111.4 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 53 Watt | |
Transistor count | 5400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 2.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 8000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |