AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT and NVIDIA Quadro P6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 53% higher core clock speed: 2310 MHz vs 1506 MHz
- Around 71% higher boost clock speed: 2815 MHz vs 1645 MHz
- 456.4x more texture fill rate: 180.2 GTexel/s vs 394.8 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 16 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 107 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 809 vs 724
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 Jan 2022 vs 1 October 2016 |
Core clock speed | 2310 MHz vs 1506 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2815 MHz vs 1645 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 180.2 GTexel/s vs 394.8 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 107 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 809 vs 724 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P6000
- 3.8x more pipelines: 3840 vs 1024
- 6x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 4 GB
- 4x more memory clock speed: 9016 MHz vs 2248 MHz, 18 Gbps effective
- Around 61% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15387 vs 9556
- Around 32% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 64134 vs 48562
- 39.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8770 vs 224
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 3840 vs 1024 |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 9016 MHz vs 2248 MHz, 18 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15387 vs 9556 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 64134 vs 48562 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8770 vs 224 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P6000
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 809 | 724 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9556 | 15387 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 48562 | 64134 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 224 | 8770 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 194.277 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1916.09 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 17.951 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.471 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 545.751 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20035 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20035 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT | NVIDIA Quadro P6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Navi 24 | GP102 |
Launch date | 19 Jan 2022 | 1 October 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 208 | 209 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $5,999 | |
Price now | $4,403.52 | |
Type | Workstation | |
Value for money (0-100) | 3.90 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2815 MHz | 1645 MHz |
Compute units | 16 | |
Core clock speed | 2310 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 360.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.53 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.765 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 3840 |
Pixel fill rate | 90.08 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 180.2 GTexel/s | 394.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 107 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 5400 million | 11,800 million |
Floating-point performance | 12,634 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort, DVI-D DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo |
Multi-display synchronization | Quadro Sync II | |
Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1 x 8-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
SLI options | 1 | |
Width | 2" (5.1 cm) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 5.1 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 24 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 143.9 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2248 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 9016 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | 384 Bit |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
ECC (Error Correcting Code) | ||
High-Performance Video I/O6 | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Desktop Management |