AMD Radeon RX 6500M vs AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6500M and AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 931 MHz
- 2.4x more boost clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 1011 MHz
- Around 90% higher texture fill rate: 153.6 GTexel/s vs 80.88 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 14 nm
- 3.2x more memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 700 MHz (1400 MHz effective)
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 391 vs 370
- Around 63% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7761 vs 4769
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 vs 1 February 2018 |
Core clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 931 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2400 MHz vs 1011 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 153.6 GTexel/s vs 80.88 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 14 nm |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 700 MHz (1400 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 391 vs 370 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7761 vs 4769 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1024
Pipelines | 1280 vs 1024 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6500M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6500M | AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 391 | 370 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7761 | 4769 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38914 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6500M | AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Navi 24 | Polaris 22 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 1 February 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 285 | 286 |
Type | Mobile workstation | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2400 MHz | 1011 MHz |
Compute units | 16 | |
Core clock speed | 2000 MHz | 931 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 307.2 GFLOPS (1:16) | 161.8 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.830 TFLOPS (2:1) | 2.588 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.915 TFLOPS | 2.588 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 76.80 GPixel/s | 32.35 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 153.6 GTexel/s | 80.88 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
Transistor count | 5400 million | 5000 million |
Compute performance | 20 | |
Texture Units | 65 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | IGP |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.2 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 1024 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 700 MHz (1400 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |