AMD Radeon RX 6500M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6500M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1506 MHz
- Around 43% higher boost clock speed: 2400 MHz vs 1683 MHz
- 760.4x more texture fill rate: 153.6 GTexel/s vs 202.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 6 nm vs 16 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 281.3x more memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 8 GB/s
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 vs 10 June 2016 |
Core clock speed | 2000 MHz vs 1506 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2400 MHz vs 1683 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 153.6 GTexel/s vs 202.0 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 8 GB/s |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
- Around 88% higher pipelines: 1920 vs 1024
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 847 vs 394
- Around 74% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13497 vs 7768
- Around 22% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 47331 vs 38902
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1920 vs 1024 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 847 vs 394 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13497 vs 7768 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 47331 vs 38902 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6500M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6500M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 394 | 847 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7768 | 13497 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38902 | 47331 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.951 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1718.593 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.283 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.289 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 710.366 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6066 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6500M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Pascal |
Code name | Navi 24 | GP104 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 10 June 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 281 | 284 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $379 | |
Price now | $359.99 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 45.72 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2400 MHz | 1683 MHz |
Compute units | 16 | |
Core clock speed | 2000 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 6 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 307.2 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.830 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.915 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1920 |
Pixel fill rate | 76.80 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 153.6 GTexel/s | 202.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 5400 million | 7,200 million |
CUDA cores | 1920 | |
Floating-point performance | 6,463 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 8-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Width | 2-slot | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB/s | 256 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 8 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |