AMD Radeon RX 6650M vs AMD Radeon RX 580
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6650M and AMD Radeon RX 580 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6650M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 65% higher core clock speed: 2068 MHz vs 1257 MHz
- Around 80% higher boost clock speed: 2416 MHz vs 1340 MHz
- Around 40% higher texture fill rate: 270.6 GTexel/s vs 192.96 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 54% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 185 Watt
- Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15113 vs 8827
- Around 70% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 66319 vs 39028
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 vs 18 April 2017 |
Core clock speed | 2068 MHz vs 1257 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2416 MHz vs 1340 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 270.6 GTexel/s vs 192.96 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 185 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15113 vs 8827 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66319 vs 39028 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 580
- Around 29% higher pipelines: 2304 vs 1792
- 4x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
- Around 1% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 767 vs 763
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2304 vs 1792 |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 767 vs 763 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6650M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 580
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6650M | AMD Radeon RX 580 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 763 | 767 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15113 | 8827 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 66319 | 39028 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 116.142 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1022.932 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 9.235 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 84.034 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 607.721 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11281 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3695 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11281 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3695 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1005 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6650M | AMD Radeon RX 580 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Navi 23 | Polaris 20 |
Launch date | 4 Jan 2022 | 18 April 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 94 | 341 |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | |
Price now | $169.99 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Value for money (0-100) | 76.21 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2416 MHz | 1340 MHz |
Compute units | 28 | 36 |
Core clock speed | 2068 MHz | 1257 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 541.2 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 17.32 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.659 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1792 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 154.6 GPixel/s | 42.88 GP/s |
Texture fill rate | 270.6 GTexel/s | 192.96 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 185 Watt |
Transistor count | 11060 million | 5,700 million |
Floating-point performance | 6.2 TFLOPs | |
Render output units | 32 | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Length | 241 mm | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 256 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 8000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |