AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT

Around 31% higher texture fill rate: 416.0 GTexel/s vs 316.8 GTexel/s
Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20765 vs 19722
Around 11% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2548 vs 2302
Around 6% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 107434 vs 101650
Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 359.653 vs 311.253
Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7156.733 vs 6622.553
Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 34.495 vs 33.932

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	416.0 GTexel/s vs 316.8 GTexel/s
Maximum memory size	12 GB vs 8 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	20765 vs 19722
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2548 vs 2302
Geekbench - OpenCL	107434 vs 101650
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	359.653 vs 311.253
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	7156.733 vs 6622.553
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	34.495 vs 33.932

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 3 month(s) later
Around 17% higher core clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 2150 MHz
Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 2640 MHz vs 2600 MHz
Around 50% higher pipelines: 3840 vs 2560
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 4 nm vs 7 nm
Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 250 Watt
Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1081 vs 970
Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 169.697 vs 118.072
Around 73% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1500.926 vs 866.201

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	2023 vs 3 Mar 2022
Core clock speed	2505 MHz vs 2150 MHz
Boost clock speed	2640 MHz vs 2600 MHz
Pipelines	3840 vs 2560
Manufacturing process technology	4 nm vs 7 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	200 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	1081 vs 970
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	169.697 vs 118.072
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	1500.926 vs 866.201

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

970

1081

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

20765

19722

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

2548

2302

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

107434

101650

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

359.653

311.253

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

7156.733

6622.553

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

34.495

33.932

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

118.072

169.697

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

866.201

1500.926

Name	AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
PassMark - G2D Mark	970	1081
PassMark - G3D Mark	20765	19722
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2548	2302
Geekbench - OpenCL	107434	101650
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	359.653	311.253
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	7156.733	6622.553
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	34.495	33.932
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	118.072	169.697
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	866.201	1500.926

Compare specifications (specs)

	AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
Essentials
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Ada Lovelace
Code name	Navi 22	AD106
Launch date	3 Mar 2022	2023
Place in performance rating	92	75
Technical info
Boost clock speed	2600 MHz	2640 MHz
Compute units	40
Core clock speed	2150 MHz	2505 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	4 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	832.0 GFLOPS (1:16)	316.8 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	26.62 TFLOPS (2:1)	20.28 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	13.31 TFLOPS	20.28 TFLOPS
Pipelines	2560	3840
Pixel fill rate	166.4 GPixel/s	126.7 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	416.0 GTexel/s	316.8 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	250 Watt	200 Watt
Transistor count	17200 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Form factor	Dual-slot	Dual-slot
Height	40 mm, 1.6 inches
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm, 10.5 inches
Recommended system power (PSU)	600 Watt	550 Watt
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 12-pin
Width	110 mm, 4.3 inches
API support
DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL	2.1	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.7	6.7
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	432.0 GB/s	288.0 GB/s
Memory bus width	192 bit	128 bit
Memory clock speed	2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective	2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6