AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT vs AMD Radeon RX 6600
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT and AMD Radeon RX 6600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 1860 MHz vs 1626 MHz
- 2.6x more texture fill rate: 739.2 GTexel/s vs 279.0 GTexel/s
- 2.9x more pipelines: 5120 vs 1792
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 29% higher memory clock speed: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1047 vs 879
- Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 28130 vs 15124
- 2.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4233 vs 1493
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 174317 vs 72885
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 10 May 2022 vs 13 Oct 2021 |
Core clock speed | 1860 MHz vs 1626 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 739.2 GTexel/s vs 279.0 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 5120 vs 1792 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1047 vs 879 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 28130 vs 15124 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4233 vs 1493 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 174317 vs 72885 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6600
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 2491 MHz vs 2310 MHz
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 132 Watt vs 335 Watt
Boost clock speed | 2491 MHz vs 2310 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 132 Watt vs 335 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6600
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT | AMD Radeon RX 6600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1047 | 879 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 28130 | 15124 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4233 | 1493 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 174317 | 72885 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 260.061 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5472.868 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.421 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 290.312 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.228 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 26778 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 69225 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 26778 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 69225 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT | AMD Radeon RX 6600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
Code name | Navi 21 | Navi 23 XL |
Launch date | 10 May 2022 | 13 Oct 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 33 | 36 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2310 MHz | 2491 MHz |
Compute units | 80 | 28 |
Core clock speed | 1860 MHz | 1626 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1,478 GFLOPS (1:16) | 558.0 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 47.31 TFLOPS (2:1) | 17.86 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 23.65 TFLOPS | 8.928 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 5120 | 1792 |
Pixel fill rate | 295.7 GPixel/s | 159.4 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 739.2 GTexel/s | 279.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 335 Watt | 132 Watt |
Transistor count | 26800 million | 11060 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort count | 3 | |
DisplayPort support | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Triple-slot | Dual-slot |
Height | 50 mm, 2 inches | 40 mm (1.6 inches) |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 190 mm (7.5 inches) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | 300 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Width | 120 mm, 4.7 inches | 110 mm (4.3 inches) |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 576.0 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |