AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 2.6x more core clock speed: 1855 MHz vs 705 MHz
- 2.9x more boost clock speed: 2499 MHz vs 876 MHz
- 2839.1x more texture fill rate: 959.6 GTexel/s vs 338 billion / sec
- Around 7% higher pipelines: 6144 vs 2x 2880
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 6% lower typical power consumption: 355 Watt vs 375 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 24 GB vs 12 GB
- 357.1x more memory clock speed: 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective vs 7.0 GB/s
- Around 96% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1255 vs 639
- 3.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 31122 vs 8905
- 8.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 189258 vs 22732
- 7.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 492.964 vs 66.419
- 11.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 14101.507 vs 1261.593
- 8.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 65.586 vs 7.89
- 25.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 461.69 vs 17.882
- 8.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2659.85 vs 309.857
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 Nov 2022 vs 28 May 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1855 MHz vs 705 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2499 MHz vs 876 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 959.6 GTexel/s vs 338 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 6144 vs 2x 2880 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 355 Watt vs 375 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB vs 12 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective vs 7.0 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1255 vs 639 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 31122 vs 8905 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 189258 vs 22732 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 492.964 vs 66.419 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 14101.507 vs 1261.593 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 65.586 vs 7.89 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 461.69 vs 17.882 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2659.85 vs 309.857 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
- 2.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 17055 vs 6841
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17055 vs 6841 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1255 | 639 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 31122 | 8905 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6841 | 17055 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 189258 | 22732 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 492.964 | 66.419 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 14101.507 | 1261.593 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 65.586 | 7.89 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 461.69 | 17.882 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2659.85 | 309.857 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8124 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2413 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2226 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8124 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2413 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2226 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Navi 31 | GK110B |
| Launch date | 3 Nov 2022 | 28 May 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 9 | 336 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,999 | |
| Price now | $1,580 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 6.46 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2499 MHz | 876 MHz |
| Compute units | 96 | |
| Core clock speed | 1855 MHz | 705 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 3.838 TFLOPS (1:16) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 122.8 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 61.42 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 6144 | 2x 2880 |
| Pixel fill rate | 479.8 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 959.6 GTexel/s | 338 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 355 Watt | 375 Watt |
| Transistor count | 57700 million | 7,080 million |
| CUDA cores | 5760 | |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 5,046 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Height | 51 mm, 2 inches | 4.376" (11.1 cm) |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 287 mm, 11.3 inches | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 750 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | Two 8-pin |
| Width | 135 mm, 5.3 inches | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 960.0 GB/s | 672 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 384 bit | 768-bit (384-bit per GPU) |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective | 7.0 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX with others
AMDRadeon RX 7900 XTX vs
NVIDIAA100 SXM4 40 GB
AMDRadeon RX 7900 XTX vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Ti
AMDRadeon RX 7900 XTX vs
AMDRadeon PRO W7900
AMDRadeon RX 7900 XTX vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
AMDRadeon RX 7900 XTX vs
NVIDIARTX 4500 Ada Generation
AMDRadeon RX 7900 XTX vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 5080
