AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1855 MHz vs 1395 MHz
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 2499 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- Around 73% higher texture fill rate: 959.6 GTexel/s vs 556.0 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 8 nm
- 2.1x more memory clock speed: 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1255 vs 1060
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 31122 vs 26668
- Around 34% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 6841 vs 5118
- Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 14101.507 vs 7585.258
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 65.586 vs 62.614
- 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 461.69 vs 209.424
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2659.85 vs 2441.384
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 Nov 2022 vs 1 Sep 2020 |
Core clock speed | 1855 MHz vs 1395 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2499 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 959.6 GTexel/s vs 556.0 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 8 nm |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1255 vs 1060 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 31122 vs 26668 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6841 vs 5118 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 14101.507 vs 7585.258 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 65.586 vs 62.614 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 461.69 vs 209.424 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2659.85 vs 2441.384 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Around 71% higher pipelines: 10496 vs 6144
- Around 1% lower typical power consumption: 350 Watt vs 355 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 191142 vs 189258
- Around 40% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 690.619 vs 492.964
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 10496 vs 6144 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt vs 355 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 191142 vs 189258 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 690.619 vs 492.964 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1255 | 1060 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 31122 | 26668 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6841 | 5118 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 189258 | 191142 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 492.964 | 690.619 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 14101.507 | 7585.258 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 65.586 | 62.614 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 461.69 | 209.424 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2659.85 | 2441.384 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ampere |
Code name | Navi 31 | GA102 |
Launch date | 3 Nov 2022 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 9 | 46 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1499 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2499 MHz | 1695 MHz |
Compute units | 96 | |
Core clock speed | 1855 MHz | 1395 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 3.838 TFLOPS (1:16) | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 122.8 TFLOPS (2:1) | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 61.42 TFLOPS | 35.58 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 6144 | 10496 |
Pixel fill rate | 479.8 GPixel/s | 189.8 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 959.6 GTexel/s | 556.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 355 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 57700 million | 28300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 51 mm, 2 inches | 138 mm (5.4 inches) |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 287 mm, 11.3 inches | 313 mm (12.3 inches) |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 750 Watt | 750 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Width | 135 mm, 5.3 inches | Triple-slot |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 24 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 960.0 GB/s | 936.2 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 384 bit | 384 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |