AMD FirePro M5100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M5100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M5100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
• Around 1% higher core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 720 MHz
• Around 80% higher memory clock speed: 4500 MHz vs 2500 MHz
• Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 800 vs 534
• Around 15% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.642 vs 35.434
• Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 108.052 vs 56.706
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 3571
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3336
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 3571
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3336

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX

• 3x more texture fill rate: 92.2 billion / sec vs 31 GTexel / s
• 2.4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 640
• Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4138 vs 2103
• Around 81% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 12232 vs 6773
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.421 vs 22.202
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 734.936 vs 537.558
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.31 vs 2.245
• Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5683 vs 2926
• Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5683 vs 2926

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro M5100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2103 4138
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	800 534
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6773 12232
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.202 25.421
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	537.558 734.936
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2.245 2.31
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	40.642 35.434
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	108.052 56.706
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2926 5683
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3713 3571
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2926 5683
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3713 3571
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3336

Compare specifications (specs)