AMD FirePro M5100 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M5100 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M5100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- 3.6x more core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 3x more texture fill rate: 31 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
- 16x more pipelines: 640 vs 40
- 9.5x better floating-point performance: 992.0 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
- Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2103 vs 1182
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 800 vs 393
- Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6773 vs 5054
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2926 vs 2095
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 3285
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2926 vs 2095
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 3285
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 16 October 2013 vs 27 May 2013 |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz vs 200 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 31 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 40 |
Floating-point performance | 992.0 gflops vs 104.0 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2103 vs 1182 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 800 vs 393 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6773 vs 5054 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2926 vs 2095 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2926 vs 2095 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 3285 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Around 68% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 775 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 775 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro M5100
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro M5100 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2103 | 1182 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 800 | 393 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6773 | 5054 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.202 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 537.558 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.245 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.642 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 108.052 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2926 | 2095 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2926 | 2095 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3285 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro M5100 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 7.5 |
Code name | Venus | Haswell GT3e |
Launch date | 16 October 2013 | 27 May 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 647 | 649 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 775 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 200 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 992.0 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 40 |
Texture fill rate | 31 GTexel / s | 10.4 GTexel / s |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 392 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
Quick Sync |