AMD FirePro M5100 vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M5100 and Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M5100
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- 3.6x more core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 200 MHz
- 3x more texture fill rate: 31 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s
- 16x more pipelines: 640 vs 40
- 9.5x better floating-point performance: 992.0 gflops vs 104.0 gflops
- Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2103 vs 1191
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 800 vs 399
- Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6311 vs 5081
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2926 vs 2095
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 3285
- Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2926 vs 2095
- Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 3285
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 16 October 2013 vs 27 May 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz vs 200 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 31 GTexel / s vs 10.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 40 |
| Floating-point performance | 992.0 gflops vs 104.0 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2103 vs 1191 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 800 vs 399 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6311 vs 5081 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2926 vs 2095 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 vs 3285 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2926 vs 2095 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 vs 3285 |
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
- Around 68% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 775 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 22 nm vs 28 nm
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 775 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm vs 28 nm |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro M5100
GPU 2: Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD FirePro M5100 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2103 | 1191 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 800 | 399 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6311 | 5081 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.202 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 537.558 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.245 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.642 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 108.052 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2926 | 2095 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3285 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2926 | 2095 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3285 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD FirePro M5100 | Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Generation 7.5 |
| Code name | Venus | Haswell GT3e |
| Launch date | 16 October 2013 | 27 May 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 643 | 644 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 775 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 992.0 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 40 |
| Texture fill rate | 31 GTexel / s | 10.4 GTexel / s |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 392 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
| Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare AMD FirePro M5100 with others
AMDFirePro M5100 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1000
AMDFirePro M5100 vs
NVIDIAQuadro NVS 210S
AMDFirePro M5100 vs
ATIRadeon HD 2600 XT
AMDFirePro M5100 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3430
AMDFirePro M5100 vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics 5200
AMDFirePro M5100 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
