AMD FirePro M5100 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD FirePro M5100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro M5100
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 1% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 725 MHz versus 720 MHz
- Environ 80% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 4500 MHz versus 2500 MHz
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 800 versus 534
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.642 versus 35.434
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 108.052 versus 56.706
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 versus 3571
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3336
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 versus 3571
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3336
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 16 October 2013 versus 23 October 2012 |
Vitesse du noyau | 725 MHz versus 720 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz versus 2500 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 800 versus 534 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.642 versus 35.434 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 108.052 versus 56.706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 versus 3571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 versus 3571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3336 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 92.2 billion / sec versus 31 GTexel / s
- 2.4x plus de pipelines: 1536 versus 640
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 4138 versus 2103
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12178 versus 6773
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.421 versus 22.202
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 734.936 versus 537.558
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.31 versus 2.245
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5683 versus 2926
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5683 versus 2926
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 92.2 billion / sec versus 31 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 versus 640 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4138 versus 2103 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12178 versus 6773 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.421 versus 22.202 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 734.936 versus 537.558 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.31 versus 2.245 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5683 versus 2926 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5683 versus 2926 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD FirePro M5100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD FirePro M5100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2103 | 4138 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 800 | 534 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6773 | 12178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.202 | 25.421 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 537.558 | 734.936 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.245 | 2.31 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 40.642 | 35.434 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 108.052 | 56.706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2926 | 5683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2926 | 5683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3336 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD FirePro M5100 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Venus | |
Date de sortie | 16 October 2013 | 23 October 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 647 | 650 |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 775 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 725 MHz | 720 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 992.0 gflops | |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 31 GTexel / s | 92.2 billion / sec |
Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | 3540 Million |
Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | large |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Options SLI | 2-way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 API |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 72 GB / s | 160 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz | 2500 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
FXAA | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |