AMD FirePro M6000 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950
Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M6000 and AMD Radeon HD 7950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M6000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- 7x lower typical power consumption: 43 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 3.2x more memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 1250 MHz
Launch date | 1 July 2012 vs 31 January 2012 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 43 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7950
- 2.8x more texture fill rate: 89.6 GTexel / s vs 32 GTexel / s
- 2.8x more pipelines: 1792 vs 640
- 2.8x better floating-point performance: 2,867 gflops vs 1,024 gflops
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
- 10.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 82144 vs 8095
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7988 vs 3024
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7988 vs 3024
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3699 vs 1832
- 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3699 vs 1832
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 89.6 GTexel / s vs 32 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 2,867 gflops vs 1,024 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 82144 vs 8095 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7988 vs 3024 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7988 vs 3024 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 vs 1832 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 vs 1832 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3357 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD FirePro M6000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7950
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD FirePro M6000 | AMD Radeon HD 7950 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8095 | 82144 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3024 | 7988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3024 | 7988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1832 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1832 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3359 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 776 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1820 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 63.74 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1177.395 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.685 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 69.23 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 343.81 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1914 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD FirePro M6000 | AMD Radeon HD 7950 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Heathrow | Tahiti |
Launch date | 1 July 2012 | 31 January 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 525 | 527 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 800 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops | 2,867 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 1792 |
Texture fill rate | 32 GTexel / s | 89.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 43 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 4,313 million |
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | |
Compute units | 28 | |
Stream Processors | 1792 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
StereoOutput3D | ||
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | n / a | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Form factor | MXM-B | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB / s | 240 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
ZeroCore |