AMD FirePro M6100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M6100 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M6100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 47% higher core clock speed: 1075 MHz vs 732 MHz
• Around 26% higher texture fill rate: 51.6 GTexel / s vs 41.0 GTexel / s
• Around 71% higher pipelines: 768 vs 448
• Around 26% better floating-point performance: 1,651 gflops vs 1,311.7 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 60% higher maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1280 MB
• Around 45% higher memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 3800 MHz
• Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.059 vs 34.324
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 166.915 vs 121.575

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

• Around 57% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1181.463 vs 750.731
• Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.978 vs 3.395
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.37 vs 57.283
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4590 vs 4537
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2133 vs 1803
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3333 vs 2517
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4590 vs 4537
• Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2133 vs 1803
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3333 vs 2517

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro M6100
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	39.059 34.324
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	750.731 1181.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.395 3.978
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	57.283 58.37
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	166.915 121.575
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4537 4590
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1803 2133
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2517 3333
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4537 4590
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1803 2133
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2517 3333

Compare specifications (specs)