AMD FirePro M6100 vs AMD Radeon HD 6790

Comparative analysis of AMD FirePro M6100 and AMD Radeon HD 6790 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M6100

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 28% higher core clock speed: 1075 MHz vs 840 MHz
• Around 54% higher texture fill rate: 51.6 GTexel / s vs 33.6 GTexel / s
• Around 23% better floating-point performance: 1,651 gflops vs 1,344.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 31% higher memory clock speed: 5500 MHz vs 4200 MHz
• Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2195 vs 1619
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 39.059 vs 12.318
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.395 vs 1.234
• Around 99% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 57.283 vs 28.768
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 166.915 vs 121.423
• Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4537 vs 3127
• Around 45% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4537 vs 3127

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6790

• Around 4% higher pipelines: 800 vs 768
• Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 373 vs 302
• Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3534 vs 1803
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3350 vs 2517
• Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3534 vs 1803
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3350 vs 2517

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD FirePro M6100
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6790

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2195 1619
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	302 373
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	39.059 12.318
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	750.731 750.421
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.395 1.234
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	57.283 28.768
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	166.915 121.423
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4537 3127
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1803 3534
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2517 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4537 3127
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1803 3534
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2517 3350

Compare specifications (specs)